Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov;4(11):1791–1798. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02510409

Table 2.

Mean differences and Pearson correlation between TBWD and TBW estimated by anthropometric equations or BIA at baseline (for all patients and those who completed the study) and at 12 mo

Parameter Baseline
12 Mo(n = 43)
All Patients at Baseline(n = 59)
Patients Who Completed the Study(n = 43)
Mean Difference (L) Correlationsa Mean Difference (L) Correlationsa Mean Difference (L) Correlationsa
TBWD − TBWWatson −0.29 ± 3.80 0.90 −0.08 ± 4.00 0.88 2.86 ± 3.83 0.90
TBWD − TBWHume −1.30 ± 3.96b 0.89 −1.06 ± 4.10 0.88 1.74 ± 4.13 0.88
TBWD − TBWChertow −4.40 ± 3.96 0.90 −4.30 ± 4.20 0.89 −1.40 ± 3.87 0.90
TBWD − TBWChumlea −1.95 ± 4.28 0.87 −2.06 ± 4.30 0.87 0.82 ± 4.05c 0.89
TBWD − TBW58 −5.54 ± 5.81 0.84 −5.30 ± 4.20 0.84 −2.36 ± 6.32 0.81
TBWD − TBWBIA 1.62 ± 3.11 0.94 1.29 ± 3.30 0.93 3.88 ± 3.91 0.90
a

All P < 0.001.

b

The best agreement of TBWD was with TBWWatson at baseline.

c

The best agreement of TBWD was with TBWChumlea at 12 mo.