Table 2.
Drug sensitivity of platinum compounds
A. Drug sensitivity of structurally diverse platinum complexes in OCT1-transfected cells | ||||||
Platinum complexes | MDCK-MOCK (μmol/L) | MDCK-hOCT1 (μmol/L) | Resistance factor | |||
Cisplatin | 6.3 ± 0.74 | 3.6 ± 0.30 | 1.7* | |||
Carboplatin | 260 ± 86 | 230 ± 86 | 1.1 | |||
[Pt(NH3)2(trans-1,2-(OCO)2C6H10)] | 21 ± 2.9 | 11 ± 2.7 | 2.0† | |||
[Pt(en)Cl2] | 33 ± 12 | 10 ± 4.8 | 3.3 * | |||
cis-[Pt(NH3)(Cy)Cl2] | 1.4 ± 0.15 | 0.16 ± 0.030 | 9.0† | |||
Oxaliplatin | 11 ± 3.7 | 0.48 ± 0.19 | 22† | |||
[Pt(S,S-DACH)oxalato] | 30 ± 14 | 1.4 ± 1.2 | 21† | |||
[Pt(R,R-DACH)Cl2] | 15 ± 3.2 | 0.65 ± 0.26 | 23† | |||
[Pt(S,S-DACH)Cl2] | 16 ± 3.7 | 0.57 ± 0.18 | 28† | |||
B. Drug sensitivity of structurally diverse platinum complexes in OCT2-transfected cells | ||||||
Platinum complexes | HEK-MOCK (μmol/L) | HEK-hOCT2 (μmol/L) | Resistance factor | |||
Cisplatin | 2.6 ± 0.52 | 1.2 ± 0.54 | 2.1* | |||
Carboplatin | 110 ± 46 | 62 ± 46 | 1.8 | |||
[Pt(NH3)2(trans-1,2-(OCO)2C6H10)] | 19 ± 5.7 | 9.9 ± 2.8 | 1.9* | |||
[Pt(en)Cl2] | 6.6 ± 1.5 | 1.1 ± 0.42 | 6.0† | |||
cis-[Pt(NH3)(Cy)Cl2] | 0.22 ± 0.043 | 0.020 ± 0.0065 | 11† | |||
Oxaliplatin | 4.1 ± 1.69 | 0.11 ± 0.020 | 37† | |||
[Pt(S,S-DACH)oxalato] | 9.0 ± 1.7 | 0.27 ± 0.062 | 33† | |||
[Pt(R,R-DACH)Cl2] | 2.1 ± 0.28 | 0.074 ± 0.026 | 28† | |||
[Pt(S,S-DACH)Cl2] | 4.5 ± 0.71 | 0.14 ± 0.041 | 33† | |||
C. The sensitivity of the colon cancer cell lines to oxaliplatin and cisplatin in the presence or absence of cimetidine | ||||||
Cell lines | Oxaliplatin |
Cisplatin |
||||
Control | Cimetidine treated | Resistance factor |
Control | Cimetidine treated |
Resistance factor |
|
HCT116‡ | 2.4 ± 1.4 | 19 ± 6.2 | 7.9† | 5.4 ± 1.3 | 10 ± 3.2 | 1.9* |
HT29‡ | 4.6 ± 1.4 | 52 ± 19 | 11† | 12. ± 3.9 | 31 ± 11 | 2.5* |
RKO‡ | 1.6 ± 0.56 | 9.7 ± 2.7 | 5.9† | 8.6 ± 2.4 | 13 ± 4.4 | 1.5 |
SW620‡ | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 14 ± 2.8 | 5.0† | 13 ± 2.0 | 22 ± 4.9 | 1.8* |
LS180‡ | 1.3 ± 0.41 | 8.4 ± 2.8 | 6.4† | 5.7 ± 1.8 | 8.3 ± 3.4 | 1.4 |
DLD | 11 ± 6.0 | 71 ± 13 | 6.7† | 18 ± 7.6 | 32 ± 10 | 1.7§ |
NOTE: The IC50 values (μmol/L) of all the platinum complexes, except for carboplatin, after 7 hours of drug exposure were determined in parallel using a MTT assay as described in Materials and Methods (A and B). The data for carboplatin in (A) and (B) were taken from Table 1A and B, respectively, and were not determined simultaneously with the other compounds. The resistance factor was defined as the ratio of the mean IC50 value in the MOCK cells to that in the OCT-transfected cells. The IC50 values (μmol/L) of oxaliplatin and cisplatin in the colon cancer cell lines (7 hours of drug exposure) were determined in the presence or absence (control) of cimetidine (1.5 mmol/L) in parallel (C). The cell seeding density was 6,000, 8,000, 6,000, 15,000, 12,000, and 4,000 cells per well for HCT116, HT29, RKO, SW620, LS180, and DLD cells, respectively. When cimetidine (1.5 mmol/L) was used, it was added to the wells immediately before the addition of the platinum drugs. The resistance factor was defined as the ratio of the mean IC50 value in the presence to that in the absence of cimetidine. All the data are expressed as mean ± SD of six measurements, and each measurement was done in quadruplicate.
P < 0.01.
P < 0.001.
The IC50 value of oxaliplatin is significantly lower than that of cisplatin in the absence of cimetidine.
P < 0.05.