Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 6;5(11):e1000558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000558

Table 1. Parameter estimates and their uncertainties.

Parameter after traditional after Inline graphic optimized after Inline graphic optimized
Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Inline graphic 1.88 4.10 5.23 11.91 1.80 1.95
Inline graphic 0.23 0.18 0.16 0.03 0.11 0.03
Inline graphic 3.67 4.66 Inline graphic 0.46 0.16 0.34
Inline graphic 6.09 33.45 1.03 0.85 1.56 1.33
Inline graphic 1.47 1.65 3.82 5.44 0.03 3.41
Inline graphic 0.59 0.96 1.24 2.71 0.58 0.52
residual 8.34 10.30 11.15
D-criterion Inline graphic 0.87 0.31 0.18
mean of variances 193.5 30.0 2.9

Parameter estimates and local approximations of their uncertainty after the traditional, the first optimized, and the second optimized experiment. Shown are the system parameters which are believed to be identical from cell to cell: the degradation rate Inline graphic of Inline graphic, the dissociation rate Inline graphic for the dissociation of Akt from the plasma membrane, the inhibitor constant Inline graphic for LY29, and the association rates Inline graphic for the binding of iRap to the FKBP domain of CF-p85, Inline graphic for the formation of the trimeric complex of CF-p85, iRap, and Lyn-FRB, and Inline graphic for the recruitment of Akt to the plasma membrane. Inline graphic and Inline graphic denote the parameter estimate and its corresponding uncertainty after the Inline graphic experiment was performed.