Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 13;106(43):18309–18314. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708837106

Table 1.

Effects of overexpression of ouro genes on tail regression in transgenic tadpoles

Transgene Stage of HS Line (F) No. of HS tadpoles (nHS) No. of GFP-expressing tadpoles (nG) nG/nHS, % Degenerated tails (nD) nD/nG, % P
Line 1 (F1)
ouro1-gfp/ouro2-gfp 57–59 Line 2 (F2) 55 43 78 31 72
Line 3 (F2)
Line 1 (F1)
50–52 Line 2 (F2) 38 27 71 0 0 <0.01
Line 3 (F2)
Line 4 (F1)
ouro1-gfp 58/59 Line 5 (F1) 74 37 50 0 0 <0.01
Line 6 (F2)
ouro2-gfp 58/59 Line 7 (F2) 36 20 56 0 0 <0.01
gfp 57–59 Line 8 (F1) 97 72 74 0 0 <0.01
Line 9 (F2)

F1 and F2 lines 1–9 were generated by mating their transgenic founders as described in Table S1 and Fig S6. GFP-expressing animals (nG) were selected from HS-treated specimens (nHS) on day 1 after HS as described in Materials and Methods. The phenotype ″Degenerated tails″ (nD) indicates that >50% of the GFP-expressing area disappeared by day 4 (around stages 61) as shown in Fig. 3E. The number of samples and phenotypes in the same experiment groups were combined (see Table S1 for details of each line). Note: HS treatment at the earlier stages (stages 50–52) for ouro1-gfp/ouro2-gfp double transgenic lines 1–3 did not initiate premature tail degeneration (see Results). P, one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan's multiple range test against ouro1-gfp/ouro2-gfp DT tadpoles treated with HS at stage 57–59.