TABLE 2.
Question | No.a | % (95% CI)b or % |
Seen or heard about NYC Condoms in past 12 mo | 223 | 76.1 (71.2, 81.0) |
Picked up NYC Condom (n = 221) | 165 | 74.7 (68.9, 80.3) |
Where respondent picked up NYC Condom (n = 165c) | ||
Community or social service agency | 66 | 40.0 |
Bar or nightclub, restaurant, or retail store | 54 | 32.7 |
DOHMH STD clinic | 12 | 7.3 |
Hospital or other health clinic | 9 | 5.5 |
Street | 7 | 4.2 |
Subway or train station | 6 | 3.6 |
Barber shop or salon | 5 | 3.0 |
Other | 17 | 10.3 |
Used NYC Condom | ||
Among all respondents (n = 292) | 117 | 40.1 (34.5, 45.7) |
Among respondents that had seen or heard of NYC Condoms (n = 222) | 117 | 52.7 (46.1, 59.3) |
Among respondents that had picked up an NYC Condom (n = 165) | 113 | 68.5 (61.4, 75.6) |
Rated experience with NYC Condom,d mean (SD) | 116 | 6.55 (2.42) |
Other condoms respondent would like DOHMH to distribute | ||
Ultra-thin/extra-sensitive | 65 | 22.3 |
Extra-strength | 53 | 18.2 |
Larger-size | 42 | 14.4 |
Studded or ribbed | 17 | 5.8 |
Flavored | 14 | 4.8 |
Colored | 10 | 3.4 |
Other brand (e.g., Trojan, Durex) | 10 | 3.4 |
Other type | 23 | 7.9 |
No other condom chosen | 58 | 19.9 |
Notes. DOHMH = Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; NYC = New York City; STD = sexually transmitted disease; CI = confidence interval.
Except where noted, n = 293.
Confidence intervals were calculated for key outcome measures only.
Not mutually exclusive.
NYC Condom ranked on scale of 1 to 10 compared with other male condoms (1 = much worse than other male condoms; 10 = much better than other male condoms). Mean (SD) rather than % was measured.