Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 18;16(6):927–934. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9137-2

Table 2.

Image quality by standard dual-detector SPECT (S-SPECT) cameras and by the DNM camera

Rest S-SPECT (n = 330) Rest DNM (n = 330) Stress S-SPECT (n = 330) Stress DNM (n = 330)
Excellent 232 (70.3%)* 275 (83.3%)* 224 (67.9%)** 282 (85.5%)**
Adequate 94 (28.5%) 47 (14.2%) 105 (31.8%)¶¶ 41 (12.4%)¶¶
Suboptimal 4 (1.2%) 8 (2.4%) 1 (0.3%) 7 (2.1%)

There were no significant differences in the rate of suboptimal quality studies at rest or stress between S-SPECT and DNM. For all other comparisons (*,**, ¶, ¶¶), P < .05.