Skip to main content
. 1999 Mar 6;318(7184):627–632. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7184.627

Table 5.

Follow up of trial babies at orthopaedic and cardiac clinics according to whether they underwent one or two neonatal screening examinations before discharge from hospital after birth. Values are numbers (percentages) of babies

Detail One screen policy (n=4835) Two screen policy (n=4877) Difference in percentage (95% CI)
Orthopaedic clinic*
Suspected hip problem at birth:
 Total No 137 (2.8) 176 (3.6) −0.8 (−1.5 to −0.1)
 No followed up at clinic 125 (2.6) 167 (3.4)
 No who required treatment 15 (0.3) 12 (0.2)
  No who had reduction under general  anaesthesia  3 (0.1)   1 (<0.1)
Hip problems not suspected at birth but babies later referred:
 Total No 71 (1.5) 77 (1.6) −0.1 (−0.6 to 0.4)
 No who required treatment  8 (0.2)  5 (0.1)
  No who had reduction under general  anaesthesia  5 (0.1)   1 (<0.1)
Babies with no click at birth but referred because of family history of hip problem:
 Total No 46 (1.0) 35 (0.7) 0.2 (−0.1 to 0.6)
 No who required treatment   3 (<0.1)   1 (<0.1)
  No who had reduction under general  anaesthesia 0 0
Cardiac clinic
No with suspected heart problem at discharge from hospital after birth 43 (0.9) 49 (1.0) −0.1 (−0.5 to 0.3)
 Confirmed at heart clinic 29 (0.6) 35 (0.7) −0.1 (−0.4 to 0.2)
No not suspected at discharge but later confirmed at heart clinic 15 (0.3) 13 (0.3) <0.1 (−0.2 to 0.3) 
*

Data source: orthopaedic clinic database. 

Data source: cardiac clinic records.