Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 14;15(42):5346–5351. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5346

Table 1.

The relationship between resection rate and clinicopathological variables (mean ± SD) n (%)

Clinicopathological variables Radicality
R0 resection (n = 49) R1 + R2 resection (n = 22) Bypass or laparotomy (n = 49)
Tumor size (cm) 4.8 ± 1.3b 7.9 ± 2.2 11.0 ± 3.8
Histopathological type
Ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 60) 15 (25.0)b 10 (16.7) 35 (58.3)
Cystadenocarcinomas (n = 39) 25 (64.1) 7 (17.9) 7 (17.9)
Others (n = 21) 7 (33.3) 6 (28.6) 8 (38.1)
Lymph node metastasis 16 (32.7)b 19 (86.4) 43 (87.8)
Peri-organ involvement1 26 (53.1)b 18 (81.8) 40 (81.6)
TNM staging
Stage I + II (n = 17) 17 (100.0)b 0 0
Stage III (n = 16) 14 (87.5) 2 (12.5) 0 (0)
Stage IVA (n = 34) 18 (52.9)2 7 (20.6) 9 (26.5)
Stage IVB (n = 53) 0 13 (24.5) 40 (75.5)
b

P < 0.01 vs R1 + R2 resection and bypass or laparotomy;

1

Peri-organ involvement included spleen, transverse colon, left kidney, stomach and their vessels;

2

Six gastric malignant tumors with pancreatic invasion, one pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma after operation, 11 pancreatic cystadenocarcinomas with splenic invasion.