TABLE 3.
Comparison of Model Performance in Terms of AUCs of ROCs on Four Different Data Sets
| Modeling algorithm | Cell viability (NTP training/test) | Cell viability (EPA test) | Caspase activation (training/test) | Salmonella (training/test) | Hepatotoxicity (training/test) |
| WFS | 0.92/0.74 | 0.72 | 0.88/0.71 | 0.81/0.77 | 0.83/0.67 |
| Naive Bayesian | 0.89/0.72 | 0.67 | 0.90/0.75 | 0.82/0.76 | 0.86/0.62 |
| SMO | 0.99/0.69 | 0.74 | 0.99/0.68 | 0.95/0.69 | 0.96/0.61 |
| SMO (logistic model) | 1/0.78 | 0.75 | 0.99/0.66 | 0.99/0.78 | 0.99/0.64 |