Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 15;65(12):1099–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.045

Table 2.

Group Performance for Smooth Pursuit and Prosaccade and Antisaccade Metrics

Ketamine Users (SD) Schizophrenia Patients (SD) Polydrug Control Subjects (SD) Non-Drug-Using Control Subjects (SD)
Smooth Pursuit Main Effects and Interaction
5° Velocity Gain 1.00 (.05) .96 (.07)a 1.01 (.05) 1.00 (.04) Target Speed
[F(2,149) = 27.12, p < .001]
10° Velocity Gain .99 (.06) .96 (.07)a 1.01 (.06) 1.00 (.04) Group
[F(3,70) = 4.06, p = .010]
20° Velocity Gain .95 (.11) .87 (.11)a .98 (.06) .97 (.06) Target Speed × Group
[F(6,140) = 1.67, p = .130]
Prosaccades F(3,73) p Value
Latency (msec) 153.01 (21.50) 168.34 (56.50) 151.27 (21.59) 166.00 (19.01) 1.10 .355
Primary Saccade Gain .94 (.06) .92 (.06) .94 (.05) .96 (.06) 1.85 .150
Final Eye Position 1.0 (.01) .93 (.20) 1.0 (.00) 1.0 (.02) 2.71c .440
Antisaccades F(3,73) p Value
Latency (msec) 264.31 (39.80) 377.29 (99.70)b 267.31 (29.09) 282.29 (48.57) 14.58 <.001
Primary Saccade Gain 1.29 (.41) .84 (.47)b 1.28 (.58) 1.02 (.53) 3.67 .016
Final Eye Position 1.25 (.34) .97 (.25)a 1.36 (.56) 1.27 (.52) 10.91c .012

Measures are mean (SD).

a

< .05 for comparisons schizophrenia versus ketamine, polydrug versus ketamine, and control versus ketamine.

b

< .01 for comparisons schizophrenia versus ketamine, polydrug versus ketamine, and control versus ketamine.

c

Kruskall Wallis χ2 approximation for nonparametric data.