Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2006 Aug 15;66(16):8200–8209. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0809

Table 1.

Growth properties of 1205 Lu, A375M, and UACC 903 cells treated with scrambled siRNA or siRNA against B-RAF, MEK, ERK, or CYCLIN D1

SiRNA treatment Melanoma cell line doubling time in vitro (hours ± SE)
1205 Lu A375M UACC 903
Controls
 Scrambled 38 ± 3 33 ± 2 26 ± 1
 Universal buffer 44 ± 7 32 ± 3 28 ± 0
 Average 41 33 27
Experimental
 B-Raf mut (A) 53 ± 10 ↑29% 46 ± 6 ↑39% 38 ± 3 ↑41%
 Mek 1 41 ± 3 NC 36 ± 3 NC 32 ± 0 ↑19%
 Mek 2 39 ± 3 NC 29 ± 2 NC 26 ± 0 NC
 Mek 1 + Mek 2 60 ± 9 ↑46% 39 ± 2 ↑18% 44 ± 5 ↑63%
 Erk 1 53 ± 0 ↑29% 34 ± 4 NC 26 ± 0 NC
 Erk 2 43 ± 4 NC 34 ± 2 NC 31 ± 1 ↑15%
 Erk 1 + Erk 2 64 ± 3 ↑56% 40 ± 2 ↑18% 37 ± 1 ↑37%
 Cyclin D1 52 ± 0 ↑27% 36 ± 3 NC 29 ± 0 NC
 Average 51 ↑24% 36 NC 33 ↑22%

NOTE: To the right of each experimental value is shown relative changes in proliferative capacity between the control average and experimental value; NC, no significant change between control average and experimental value (i.e., a difference of ≤3 hours).