Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Sep;84(3):602–609. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.602

TABLE 1.

Summary of systematic review of literature reporting a parathyroid hormone (PTH)– 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] threshold1

Reference n Health of population Sex Age Optimal 25 (OH)D 25(OH)D PTH Correlation2 PTH plateau Dietary vitamin D Dietary calcium 25(OH)D assay method Assay manufacturer3
y nmol/L nmol/L pg/mL pg/mL μg/d mg/d
Aloia et al (5) 208 Healthy F 60.5 ± 6.254,5 44 57.0 ± 27.35 37.8 ±16.65 −0.23 33 4.6 ± 4.55 1330 ± 1815 RIA DiaSorin
Chapuy et al (7) 1569 Healthy M/F 50 ± 6 78 61.0 ± 30.0 40.0 ± 16.0 −0.076 36 3.4 ± 7.6 849 ± 481 RIA DiaSorin
Cheng et al (8) 193 Healthy F 117 408 32.6 ± 10.85 39.0 ± 13.05 −0.31 33 2.7 733 RIA DiaSorin
Dawson-Hughes et al (9) 391 Osteoporosis M/F 70.8 ± 4.55 110 75.2 ± 33.95 37.3 ± 16.25 NA NA 4.75 ± 2.675 734 ± 3555 CPB 9
Fuleihan et al (11) 346 Healthy M/F 13.3 ± 1.655 75 49.0 ± 18.85 42.510 −0.37 NA 3.75 ± 3.985 661 ± 4585 RIA DiaSorin
Gallagher et al (12) 735 Osteoporosis M/F 70.9 ± 45 100 76.3 ± 24.35 36.8 ± 13.44 −0.31 28 3.95 ± 2.525 640 ± 3765 CPB
Gannage-Yared et al (13) 316 Healthy M/F 40 ± 5.6 25 24.2 ± 17.7 43.3 ± 21.4 −0.35 NA 2.51 ± 1.70 683 ± 276 RIA DiaSorin
Gloth et al (16) 208 Other11 M/F 77.9 ± 7.25 37.5 42.2 ± 19.35 43.7 ± 22.45 −0.42 NA NA NA RIA
Gomez-Alonso et al (17) 268 Osteoporosis M/F 68 ± 8.55 75 41.0 ± 21.8 51.5 ± 22.55 −0.30 NA NA NA RIA IDS
Guillemant et al (20) 394 Healthy M 157 82.8 39.6 ± 8.25 33.1 ± 10.45 −0.50 23 NA 809 ± 409 CPB
Haden et al (21) 237 Osteoporosis F 56 ± 14 62.5 57.5 ± 27.512,13 37.012 −0.30 49 NA 80812 RIA DiaSorin
Harkness and Cromer (22) 393 Healthy F 15.5 ± 1.6 90 55.0 ± 30.4 39.4 ± 20.6 −0.34 30 NA NA CPB Nichols
Harris and Cromer (23) 246 Osteoporosis M/F 75.6 ± 7.65 50 54.1 ± 26.8 58.1 ± 38.3 −0.30 NA NA NA CPB
Holick et al (24) 1536 Osteoporosis F 71.1 ± 9.0 74.5 76.0 ± 33.0 31.010 −0.29 27.2 NA NA CPB Nichols
Isaia et al (25) 700 Osteoporosis F 67.8 ± 5.7 82.5 27.3 ± 25.0 36.6 ± 28.3 −0.38 NA NA 784 ± 395 RIA DiaSorin
Jesudason et al (26) 486 Osteoporosis F 63 ± 9.5 60 62.8 ± 25.0 50.4 ± 27.6 −0.24 47.5 NA NA RIA IDS
Kauppinen-Makelin et al (27) 205 Other14 M/F 54.3 50 35.3 ± 18.013 39.0 −0.236 NA NA NA RIA DiaSorin
Kinyamu et al (30) 376 Osteoporosis F 71 ± 35 122 78.6 ± 24.95 35.6 ± 13.15 −0.33 28 6.95 ± 2.15 744 ± 3075 CPB
Lamberg-Allardt et al (31) 202 Healthy F 38 ± 3 80 47.0 ± 34.0 30.0 ± 13.0 −0.235 26 4.7 ± 2.5 962 ± 423 RIA DiaSorin
Lamberg-Allardt et al (31) 126 Healthy M 37 ± 4 40 45.0 ± 35.0 24.0 ± 12.0 −0.206 23 5.6 ± 3.2 1037 ± 489 RIA DiaSorin
Malabanan et al (33) 35 Healthy 67 ± 8 50 87.5 ± 14.8 45.0 ± 17.8 NA NA NA 1250 CPB Nichols
Melin et al (34) 104 Osteoporosis M/F 85 ± 45 75 66.1 ± 28.55 51.1 ± 21.75 −0.30 43 NA 525 ± 2395 RIA DiaSorin
Need et al (35) 496 Osteoporosis F 62 ± 8.7 40 61.0 ± 24.5 41.6 ± 19.5 −0.28 NA NA NA CPB
Need et al (36) 918 Osteoporosis F 64 ± 9.3 50 61.0 ± 25.0 47.0 ± 24.0 −0.21 NA NA NA RIA DiaSorin
Ooms et al (37) 330 Healthy F 80.3 ± 5.6 25 28.1 ± 13.0 37.1 ± 22.8 NA NA NA 1100 CPB
Outila et al (38) 178 Healthy F 15.3 ± 0.6 408 39.0 ± 14.0 30.0 ± 14.0 −0.186 30 4.3 ± 2.8 1216 ± 591 RIA DiaSorin
Soontrupa et al (44) 106 Healthy F 69.4 ± 6.8 87.5 83.3 ± 17.8 32.3 ± 18.0 −0.423 25 NA NA RIA DiaSorin
Souberbielle et al (45) 280 Healthy M/F 69.57 30 28.8 ± 9.3 35.0 ± 20.0 −0.31 NA NA NA CPB
Steingrimsdottir et al (46) 944 Healthy M/F 55.7 ± 15.35 45 46.2 ± 19.55 38.0 ± 16.15 NA NA 13.0 ± 9.85 1233 ± 5405 RIA DiaSorin
Thomas et al (47) 290 Other15 M/F 62.0 ± 19.0 37.5 37.5 ± 22.5 46.8 ± 44.45 NA NA 7.5 ± 7.3 NA CPB Nichols
Vieth et al (48) 1741 Other16 M/F 56.9 ± 14.8 7317 52.5 ± 22.08,13 40.48 NA 29.517 NA NA RIA DiaSorin
1

RIA, radioimmunoassay; CPB, competitive protein binding; IDS, Immuno Diagnostic Systems; NA, not available.

2

Correlation between PTH and 25(OH)D.

3

DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN; IDS, Boldon, United Kingdom; Nichols Advantage, San Clemente, CA.

4

± SD (all such values).

5

For some studies with subgroups, the mean ± SD was reported only for each subgroup for some variables; in these cases, the weighted mean was computed and the overall SD was estimated from the pooled variance.

6

For a few studies, the correlation was computed but not reported; in these cases, the correlation was estimated from the reported sample size and P value.

7

For a few studies, the mean age was not reported; in these cases, it was estimated by taking the average of the minimum and maximum ages.

8

Outila et al (38) inferred the optimal vitamin D status from concentrations of PTH above the mean; Cheng et al (8) simply confirmed higher PTH values below the value reported by Outila et al.

9

Not specified in the report.

10

For a few studies, the mean was estimated from the provided graphic—eg, box plot or bar graph.

11

Elderly patients (homebound, nursing home residents, and ambulatory).

12

Median.

13

Estimated from the range.

14

Inpatients on general medical wards and healthy outpatients.

15

Inpatients on general medical wards.

16

Patients with thyroid disease or osteoporosis.

17

The threshold was not detected after log transformation, and Vieth et al concluded that there is no threshold.