Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2006 Oct 5;89(1-3):49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2006.08.004

Table 1.

Subject demographics, cognitive measures, and ROI volumes

SPD mean
(S.D.)
Comparison
mean (S.D.)
F, p or Mann–
Whitney U
Age 28.8 (8.1) 30.8 (10.1) .566 0.45
PSES 4.2 (.9) 4.4 (.7) .789 0.38
SES 3.0 (1.0) 4.0 (1.0) 12.258 0.001
Years of education 15.0 (1.9) 16.4 (1.5) 6.618 0.005
WAIS-R
   vocabulary
13.1 (1.7) 13.9 (1.8) 2.142 0.15
WAIS-R
   block design
12.5 (2.7) 12.1 (2.1) .272 0.6
DA total errors 12.8 (15.0) 5.6 (7.5) 4.313 0.04
DA perseverations 2.7 (3.9) .56 (1.0) 7.142 0.01
DA failure
   to maintain set
.85 (1.3) .28 (.6) 3.561 <0.07
WMS-R Logical
   Memory 1 (%)
32.2 (5.6) 34.2 (4.9) 1.364 <0.3
CVLT total words 60.5 (4.6) 63.3 (6.5) 2.608 0.113
CVLT Semantic
   Clustering
2.6 (.8) 2.7 (.7) .296 <0.6
Left
   hippocampus ◊
2.75 (.2) 3.20 (.2) 54.0 <0.0005
Right
   hippocampus ◊
2.88 (.3) 3.37 (.3) 54.0 <0.0005
CSP (# slices) ◊ 2.8 (1.7) 1.69 (1.2) 177.0 <0.02

Subject demographics, cognitive measures, and hippocampal volumes. Hippocampus given as absolute volumes, statistics performed on ICC corrected volumes. Hippocampus volume measures were not normally distributed on the left for SPD subjects (Shapiro–Wilk=0.870, p=0.012), nor for the number of slices containing a CSP for both SPD and comparison subjects (SPD: Shapiro–Wilk=0.861, p=0.008; comparison subjects Shapiro–Wilk=0.894, p=0.007).