Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 16.

Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2008 Oct 27;118(20):2022–2028. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.748962

A. Comparison of primary event rates for the TWA+ (broken line) and TWA- (solid line) patients among subjects randomized to ICD or Control (primary endpoint of the study). There was no significant difference between event rates for the 2 groups (HR =1.24, p=0.56). B. Comparison of event rates for the TWA non − (broken line) and TWA − (solid line) patients in the ICD and Control groups. Again event rates did not differ significantly for the groups (HR = 1.28, p=0.46).

A. Comparison of primary event rates for the TWA+ (broken line) and TWA- (solid line) patients among subjects randomized to ICD or Control (primary endpoint of the study). There was no significant difference between event rates for the 2 groups (HR =1.24, p=0.56). B. Comparison of event rates for the TWA non − (broken line) and TWA − (solid line) patients in the ICD and Control groups. Again event rates did not differ significantly for the groups (HR = 1.28, p=0.46).