Skip to main content
. 1999 Mar 13;318(7185):706–711. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7185.706

Table 4.

Difference between intervention and control groups in prescribed drugs and use of health services at 1 year follow up. Values are numbers (percentages) of patients unless stated otherwise

Detail All patients
Patients with myocardial infarction
Patients with angina
Control (n=297) Intervention (n=262) Difference (95% CI) between intervention and control Control (n=198) Intervention (n=191) Control (n=99) Intervention (n=71)
Antihypertensive drugs
All patients treated* 230 (77) 210 (80) 3% (−4% to 10%) 161 (81) 165 (86) 69 (70) 45 (63)
Patients with untreated high blood pressure 10 (3)  5 (2) 4 (2) 2 (1) 6 (6) 3 (4)
Cholesterol lowering agent
All patients treated*  85 (29)  79 (30) 1% (−7% to 9%) 59 (30) 58 (30) 26 (26) 21 (30)
Patients with cholesterol ⩾5.5mmol/l but not receiving treatment 122 (41) 100 (38) 79 (40) 73 (38) 43 (43) 27 (38)
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors
All patients treated*  91 (31)  95 (36) 6% (0% to 13%) 83 (42) 90 (47) 8 (8) 5 (7)
Aspirin
All patients treated* 252 (85) 228 (87) 2% (−4% to 8%) 177 (89) 171 (90) 75 (76) 57 (80)
Rehabilitation
Patients attending at least one session  70 (24) 109 (42) 18% (10% to 26%) 60 (30) 79 (41) 10 (10) 30 (42)
Practice attendance
Mean No of visits to practice nurse 0.3 0.7 0.4 (0.2 to 0.6) 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.8
Mean No of visits to GP 0.9 1.1  0.2 (−0.1 to 0.4) 0.9 1.0 0.7 1.2

GP=general practitioner. 

*

Those not followed up assumed to be continuing baseline behaviour. High blood pressure defined as systolic pressure ⩾60 mm Hg or diastolic pressure ⩾100 mm Hg. 

For issues related to ischaemic heart disease in previous 3 months.