Table 3.

Correlation of change scores of each instrument

	Correlation with
Instrument scale	CTSI-SS	CTSI-FS	DASH	Satisfaction (n = 58)
CTSI-SS (60)	—	—	—	0.337**
CTSI-FS (59)	0.467**	—	—	0.175
DASH (55)	0.665**	0.641**	—	0.196
SF-36-PF (60)	−0.318*	−0.371**	−0.485**	−0.236
SF-36-RP (58)	−0.358**	−0.291*	−0.410**	0.051
SF-36-BP (60)	−0.580**	−0.397**	−0.621**	−0.254
SF-36-GH (59)	0.318*	−0.145	−0.292*	−0.252
SF-36-VT (59)	−0.412**	−0.421**	−0.392**	−0.188
SF-36-SF (60)	−0.186	−0.350**	−0.324**	−0.028
SF-36-RE (56)	−0.437**	−0.264	−0.420**	−0.06
SF-36-MH (58)	−0.267*	−0.474**	−0.449**	−0.102
VAH (57)	0.355**	−0.186	−0.393**	−0.108
Grip strength (66)	−0.181	0.064	−0.142	0.002
Pinch (66)	−0.183	−0.147	−0.056	−0.174
s-2PD (60)	0.003	0.013	0.026	−0.03

* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01; Spearman’s correlations (r_s)

Boldface results indicate a significant correlation, when P < 0.05 and |r_s| > 0.5