Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2009 Nov;45(6):1682–1694. doi: 10.1037/a0016119

Table 4.

Multiple Group Analyses—Effects of American Orientation on Model Relationships

Constrained Path χ2 (df) χ2 Difference Test p-value
Alienation
1. None 0 (0) --
2. w1 discrimination → w2 discrimination
w1 alienation → w2 alienation
4.04 (2) n.s.
3. w1 discrimination → w2 alienation
w1 alienation → w2 discrimination
4.53 (4) n.s.
4. w2 discriminationw2 alienation 17.89 (5) .000

Depressive Symptoms
1. None 0 (0) --
2. w1 discrimination →w2 discrimination
w1 depression →w2 depression
0.18 (2) n.s.
3. w1 discrimination →w2 depression
w1 depression →w2 discrimination
4.08 (4) n.s.
4. w2 discrimination →w2 depression 5.46 (5) n.s.

School Engagement
1. None 0 (0) --
2. w1 discrimination →w2 discrimination
w1 engagement →w2 engagement
1.06 (2) n.s.
3. w1 engagement →w2 discrimination 1.73 (3) n.s.
4. w1 discriminationw2 engagement 8.17 (4) .01
4. w2 discriminationw2 engagement 13.57 (5) .02

Grades in School
1. None 0 (0) --
2. w1 discrimination →w2 discrimination
w1 grades →w2 grades
4.14 (2) n.s.
3. w1 discrimination →w2 grades
w1 grades →w2 discrimination
4.14 (4) n.s.
4. w2 discriminationw2 grades 8.45 (5) .04

Note. Models are nested step-wise such that a given step includes current constraints as well as constraints imposed in previous steps. n.s. denotes nonsignificant difference.