Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 21.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 21;151(2):103–109. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-00007

Table 2.

Absolute and relative risk for high risk findings at third exam based on findings from two prior examinationsa

Adenoma Findings @ baseline Adenoma Findings @ 2nd exam Mean follow up time (mos) 2nd–3rd exam (SD) n (%) in strata
(a)
n with high risk findings on 3rd exam
(b)
Absolute risk (95% CI) for advanced or multiple on 3rd exam
(c=b/a)
Number Needed to Scope to identify clinically significant findings on 3rd exam
(d=1/c)
High Risk High Risk 42 (16) 44 (7.8) 8 18.2%
(8.2, 32.7)
5.5
High Risk Low Risk 44 (13) 59(10.5) 8 13.6%
(6.0, 25.0)
7.4
High Risk No adenomas 51 (13) 122(21.6) 15 12.3%
(7.0, 19.5)
8.1
Low Risk High Risk 37 (13) 40(7.1) 8 20.0%
(9.0, 35.6)
5
Low Risk Low Risk 44 (12) 95(16.8) 9 9.5%
(4.4, 17.2)
10
Low Risk No adenomas 51 (14) 204(36.2) 10 4.9%
(2.4, 8.8)
20.4
a

The risk difference between those with no adenomas at 2nd exam and high risk vs low risk findings at baseline was 0.07 (95% CI 0.01, 0.14)

The risk difference between those with low risk adenomas at 2nd exam and high risk vs low risk findings at baseline was 0.04 (95% CI −0.06, 0.15)

The risk difference between those with high risk adenomas at 2nd exam and high risk vs low risk findings at baseline was −0.02 (95% CI −0.19, 0.15)