Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2009 Mar 27;87(6):825–830. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318199c7d2

Table 1.

Histological assessment of the liver and islet after transplantation.

A. Comparison among each time points in histological changes.
At transplantation (POD0) Early stage (POD2) Late stage (POD28)
(n=73) (n=34) (n=25)
Liver: Necrosis 0/73 (0±0) 23/34 (0.68±0.08)*§ 0/25 (0±0)
Liver: Hypoxia 0/73 (0±0) 24/34 (0.71±0.08)*§ 0/25 (0±0)
Liver: Apoptosis 2/73 (0.03±0.02) 25/34 (0.74±0.08)*§ 0/25 (0±0)
Islet: Cellular Infiltration 0/73 (0±0) 15/34 (0.44±0.09)*§ 0/25 (0±0)
Islet: Apoptosis (%) 5.65±2.04 62.00±7.41*§ 0±0
B. Comparison between necrotic / non-necrotic area in islet size, portal vein diameter and percentage of islet size and portal vein diameter.
Islet size diameter (µm) Portal vein (µm) Ratio (%)
Necrotic area (n=23) 57.56±6.69 70.61±7.02 85.78±2.70
Non-necrotic area (n=11) 68.62±19.51 155.83±41.67* 56.96±9.25*

Histological change score was indicated as: islet numbers accompanied with histological change (necrosis, hypoxia, apoptosis and cellular infiltration) / total islet numbers (mean score ± standard error of the mean (SEM)), except Islet Apoptosis (%). Islet Apoptosis (%) was indicated as the percentage of apoptotic to total islet cells. “n” is total islet number.

*

significant difference (p<0.05), at the early stage vs. at transplantation.

§

significant difference, at the early stage vs. at the late stage.

We measured islet and portal vein size and its ratio (= (islet size / portal vein diamter) X 100) from islet in POD2.

*

significant difference (p<0.05), comparing necrotic with non-necrotic area.