Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2009 Aug;62(2):365–372. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21992

Table 1.

1.5T and 3T Siemens scanner types and software/hardware combinations involved in this study.

Field strength System Receive coil type Number of sites involved Number of subjects scanned Software versions Number of datasets
1.5 T Symphony 1 channel CP Mode 9 44 VA21A;VA25A;VA30A 185
Sonata 1 channel CP Mode 4 25 VA25A;VA30A 113
Sonata 8 channels PA 2 17 VA25A 71
Avanto 12 channels PA 4 18 VB11D;VB13A;VB15 62

3 T Allegra 1 channel BC 3 19 VA25A 67
Trio 8 channels PA 8 46 VA25A 178
TimTrio 12 channels PA 6 19 VB12T;VB13A;VB15 72

Total 6 4 36 188 7 749

The number of sites, the receive coil type (birdcage BC, Phased-Array PA), with operating mode (Circularly Polarized CP if applicable) and software versions, the number of subjects (who had baseline or/and follow-up scans back-to-back) and the total number of datasets for each system are indicated.