Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct;68(4):561–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03494.x

Table 2.

Parameters of the relationship between rituximab mean-concentration and progression-free survival

Value in study:
Parameter Significance Method Pivotal [15, 17] (A) Weng [22] (B) van Oers [14] (C) Cartron [20] (D)
λmax (month−1) λ in absence of RTX or CT Fixed for each study 0.16 0.16 0.050 0.067
Cm50,O (mg l−1) Cm50 in overall population Estimated in A, reported in studies B, C and D 35.1 (2.2)*
Cm50,R (mg l−1) Cm50 in responders 18.0 (0.87)*
Cm50,VV (mg l−1) Cm50 in VV patients Calculated from study B (HRFx/VV) and Cm50,O 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8
Cm50,Fx (mg l−1) Cm50 in Fx patients 78.9 78.9 78.9 78.9
γO γ in overall population Estimated in A, reported in studies B, C and D 0.48 (0.052)*
γR γ in responders 1.5 (0.11)*
γVV γ in VV patients Fixed 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
γFx γ in Fx patients 0.48 0.5 0.5 0.5
*

In study A, for estimated parameters, results are presented as: estimation (standard deviation). CT, chemotherapy; Cm50, mean-time concentrations leading to 50% of the maximum hazard; γ, shape factor; λ, hazard; RTX, rituximab.