Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Sep;86(9):1096–1103. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181b6210f

Table 1.

Comparison of characteristics between post-treatment asymptomatic CITT patients who completed the 12-month follow-up visit and those who did not.

Characteristic Completed visit
(n=70)
Missed visit
(n=9)
p-value
Mean (std) age (years) 12.0 (2.4) 13.0 (2.7) 0.26
% female 68.6 33.3 0.038
% White 54.3 55.6 0.94
% Hispanic 30.0 100.0 <0.001
% with parent-reported ADHD 5.7 22.2 0.18

Mean (std) CISS score
   At eligibility 25.6 (8.1) 25.6 (9.7) 0.22
   At week 12 8.6 (4.8) 7.1 (4.5) 0.33

Mean (std) NPC break (cm)
   At eligibility 13.3 (6.3) 11.7 (6.6) 0.27
   At week 12 5.1 (3.4) 6.8 (6.3) 0.94

Mean (std) PFV (Δ)
   At eligibility 11.2 (3.8) 11.2 (1.6) 0.92
   At week 12 25.9 (11.1) 24.9 (11.3) 0.82

Mean (std) accommodative amplitude (D)
   At eligibility 9.8 (3.6) 10.4 (3.1) 0.49
   At week 12 15.1 (5.2) 12.8 (4.3) 0.22

Mean (std) accommodative facility (cpm)
   At eligibility 7.2 (4.3) 6.3 (4.6) 0.41
   At week 12 14.2 (5.6) 11.2 (5.6) 0.17

Mean (std) phoria at near (Δ)
   At eligibility 9.4 exo (4.5) 7.3 exo (2.8) 0.20
   At week 12 7.8 exo (5.3) 6.9 exo (3.5) 0.76

ADHD: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

CISS: Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey

NPC: Near Point of Convergence

PFV: Positive Fusional vergence at near