Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 15;195(12):1107–1120. doi: 10.1007/s00359-009-0481-0

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Linear and superlinear receptive field maps of DNOVS2. a Receptive field of DNOVS2. b Expected receptive field for DNOVS1, calculated by a summation of the receptive fields of VS5 and VS6 (Fig. 2). c DIs between the average receptive field (RF mean) and each measured receptive field (RF n) of DNOVS1 (gray dots) and the DI between the average receptive field (RF mean) and the expected receptive field (RF exp) marked with a black square. d Contralateral LMS and LPD were recorded while DNOVS2 was depolarized by ipsilateral downward motion. e Receptive field of V2. f “Superlinear receptive field of DNOVS2”, calculated by adding the contralateral local motion sensitivity of DNOVS2 (d) to its receptive field (a). Data represent the mean responses recorded from n flies (DNOVS2 = 3, depolarized DNOVS2 = 3, V2 = 4)