TABLE 1.
Accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis compared with catheter-based coronary angiography (CCA)
Reference | Patients, n | Patient population | Mean age, years | Men, % | Prevalence of CAD, % | Vessel diameter analyzed | Assessability, % | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | NPV, % | PPV, % | Diagnostic accuracy, % | Positive likelihood ratio | Negative likelihood ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ong et al (7) | 134 | Scheduled angiography | 55 | 73 | 73 | ≥1.5 mm | 90 | 82 | 96 | 96 | 79 | 93 | 20.5 | 0.2 |
Meijboom et al (8) | 104 | Suspected CAD | 59 | 72 | 85 | N/A | 100 | 92 | 91 | 99 | 60 | 91 | 10.2 | 0.1 |
Ropers et al (9) | 84 | Scheduled angiography | 58 | 62 | 32 | ≥1.5 mm | 96 | 93 | 97 | 100 | 56 | 97 | 31.0 | 0.1 |
Oncel et al (10) | 80 | Suspected CAD | 56 | 76 | 77 | ≥2 mm | 100 | 96 | 98 | 99 | 91 | 98 | 48 | 0 |
Nikolaou et al (11) | 72 | Suspected CAD | 64 | 82 | 54 | ≥1.5 or2 mm | 90 | 82 | 95 | 97 | 72 | 93 | 27.3 | 0.2 |
Raff et al (12)* | 70 | Suspected CAD | 59 | 73 | 54 | All vessels | 100 | 86 | 95 | 98 | 66 | 94 | 17.2 | 0.1 |
Ehara et al (13)† | 69 | Suspected CAD | 69 | 75 | 88 | All vessels | 92 | 90 | 94 | 95 | 89 | 93 | 15.0 | 0.1 |
Leschka et al (14)‡ | 67 | Suspected CAD | 62 | 74 | 70 | ≥1.5 mm | 100 | 94 | 97 | 99 | 87 | 97 | 31.3 | 0.1 |
Schuijf et al (15) | 61 | Scheduled angiography | 60 | 77 | 52 | N/A | 99 | 85 | 98 | 99 | 82 | 93 | 42.5 | 0.3 |
Leber et al (16) | 55 | Scheduled angiography | N/A | N/A | 56 | All vessels | 100 | 77 | 97 | 95 | 85 | 94 | 25.7 | 0.2 |
Mollet et al (17) | 52 | Scheduled angiography | 59 | 65 | 90 | ≥1.5 or | 100 | 99 | 95 | 99 | 76 | 96 | 19.8 | 0.0 |
Mühlenbruch et al (18)§ | 51 | Suspected CAD | 59 | 76 | 88 | N/A | 91 | 87 | 95 | 98 | 75 | 94 | 17.4 | 0.1 |
Plass et al (19) | 50 | Scheduled angiography | 66 | 78 | 80 | ≥1.5 mm | 92 | 93 | 97 | 98 | 91 | 96 | 31 | 0.1 |
Scheffel et al (20) | 38 | Scheduled angiography | 50 | 76 | 76 | ≥1.0 mm | 98 | 93 | 99 | 99 | 91 | 99 | 93 | 0.1 |
Pugliese et al (21)* | 21 | Stable angina | 61 | 100 | 71 | All vessels | 100 | 99 | 96 | 99 | 78 | 96 | 24.8 | 0.0 |
Total | 1008 | 97 | 89 | 96 | 98 | 79 | 95 | 22.3 | 0.1 |
All studies were blinded.
Quantitative CCA was not performed. Evaluation of coronary artery stenosis was made by visual analysis of CCA;
57% of patients had at least 1 stent;
Beta-blockers were not administered for heart rate reduction;
Defined coronary artery stenosis as >70% luminal narrowing of vessel. Coronary artery stenosis was defined as >50% luminal narrowing of vessel in all other studies. CAD Coronary artery disease; N/A Not available; NPV Negative predictive value; PPV Positive predictive value