Table 2.
Subgroup | No. of Studies | No. of Subjects | Reference Nos. | CT vs. CC |
TT vs. CC |
||
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||||
Ethnic groupb | |||||||
White | 14 | 13,992 | 32, 38, 75, 78–86, 87, 88 | 0.97 | 0.86, 1.09 | 0.83 | 0.74, 0.94 |
Asianc | 8 | 5,183 | 33, 67–69, 71–74 | 0.97 | 0.86, 1.10 | 0.80 | 0.67, 0.96 |
Geographic regiond | |||||||
United States | 8 | 12,922 | 27–29, 32, 38, 39, 66, 85 | 1.01 | 0.94, 1.09 | 0.80 | 0.71, 0.91 |
Europe | 10 | 9,842 | 75, 78–84, 87, 88 | 0.99 | 0.91, 1.08 | 0.90 | 0.72, 1.13 |
Asiac | 9 | 5,776 | 33, 67–74 | 0.99 | 0.87, 1.11 | 0.81 | 0.68, 0.97 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Meta-estimate P value: white—CT, P = 0.56; TT, P = 0.003; Asian—CT, P = 0.66; TT, P = 0.016; United States—CT, P = 0.78; TT, P < 0.001; Europe—CT, P = 0.77; TT, P = 0.35; Asia—CT, P = 0.80; TT, P = 0.02.
Six studies were excluded because they contained mixed racial/ethnic groups or insufficient numbers of studies for grouping (e.g., the study population in the study by Wang et al. (70) was 100% Indian).