Abstract
St John’s wort (SJW) extracts, prepared from the aerial parts of Hypericum perforatum, contain numerous pharmacologically active ingredients, including naphthodianthrones (e.g., hypericin and its derivatives), phloroglucinols derivatives (e.g., hyperforin, which inhibits the reuptake of a number of neurotransmitters, including serotonin), and flavonoids. Such extracts are widely used for the treatment of mild-to-moderate depression. As a monotherapy, SJW has an encouraging safety profile. However, relevant and, in some case, life-threatening interactions have been reported, particularly with drugs which are substrate of cytochrome P450 and/or P-glycoprotein. Well-documented SJW interactions include (1) reduced blood cyclosporin concentration, as suggested by multiple case reports as well as by clinical trials, (2) serotonin syndrome or lethargy when SJW was given with serotonin reuptake inhibitors, (3) unwanted pregnancies in women while using oral contraceptives and SJW, and (4) reduced plasma drug concentration of antiretroviral (e.g., indinavir, nevirapine) and anticancer (i.e., irinotecan, imatinib) drugs. Hyperforin, which is believed to contribute to the antidepressant action of St John’s wort, is also strongly suspected to be responsible of most of the described interactions.
Key words: cytochrome P450 enzymes, herb–drug interactions, herbal products, P-glycoprotein, St John’s wort
INTRODUCTION
A growing percentage of the population is using herbal products for preventive and therapeutic purposes. Herbal product annual retail sales reflect the growing consumer interest; indeed, sale statistics demonstrate a 3.4% increase from 2003 to 2004 and an additional 2.1% increase in 2005 compared to 2004 for all herbal products (1). The reason of this wide usage of natural drugs is the notion that, being natural, all herbs are safe. However, contrary to popular belief that “natural is safe”, herbal drugs can cause significant side effects, including herb–drug interactions (2–4). In the last years, concerns about interactions between the natural top-selling antidepressant remedy Hypericum perforatum and conventional drugs have been raised (5–8). H. perforatum, more commonly known as St John’s wort (SJW), is a herbaceous perennial plant native to Europe. Extracts obtained from the aerial parts of H. perforatum have been recommended traditionally for a wide range of medical conditions. The most common modern-day use of St John’s wort commercial extracts (Table I) is for the treatment of depression. Several systematic reviews report St John’s wort to be more effective than placebo and equally effective as synthetic antidepressant drugs in the short-term treatment of depressive disorders, including major depression (9–11). Experimentally, SJW and its active ingredient hyperforin have been shown to inhibit the reuptake of several neurotransmitters such as serotonin, noradrenaline, dopamine, glutamate, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (12,13).
Table I.
Some Commercially Available St John’s Wort Extracts Evaluated for Possible Drug Interactions
| Extract type or brand name | Standardization | Pharmaceutical form | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esbericum® | Hyperforin 1.47% | Capsules containing 60 mg of SJW extract | Schaper & Bruemmer, Salzgitter, Germany |
| Hypericum 2000 plus® | Hypericin 0.055%, hyperforin 0.75% | Capsules containing SJW extract (equivalent to 2 g dry herb), Ginkgo biloba (equivalent to leaf dry 100 mg), and nutritional cofactors | Nutra-Life, New Zealand |
| Jarsin 300® | Hypericin 0.28% | Tablets containing 300 mg of SJW dried extract (LI-160™) | Lichtwer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany |
| Kira® (USA) | |||
| Kira® (UK) | Hypericin 0.28% | Tablets containing 100 mg of SJW dried extract (LI-160™) | Lichtwer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany |
| LI-160 | Hypericin 0.12–0.28% | Dried extract of SJW flowers and leaves | Lichtwer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany |
| Neuroplant® | Hypericin 0.12–0.28%, hyperforin 3–6% | Tablets containing 300 mg (Neuroplant®) or 600 mg (Neuroplant® AKTIV) WS® 5570 dried extract | Dr. Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals, Karlsruhe, Germany |
| Neuroplant® AKTIV | |||
| Movina® | Hyperforin 3–6% | Capsules containing 300 mg of SJW extract | Boehringer Ingelheim AB, Skärholmen, Sweden |
| Solaray® | Hypericin 0.12–0.3% | Capsules containing 300 mg SJW extract | Solaray |
| TruNature® | Hypericin 0.3% | Soft gels containing 300 mg SJW extract | Leiner Health Products, Carson, CA, USA |
| WS® 5570 | Hypericin 0.12–0.28%, hyperforin 3–6% | Dried extract of SJW flowers and leaves | Dr. Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals, Karlsruhe, Germany |
| Ze 117 | Hypericin 0.2% and low content of hyperforin (<0.5%) | 50% (w/w) ethanol extract of SJW | Zeller AG, Switzerland |
SJW St John’s wort
Given the widespread use of SJW and in light of the consideration that herb–drug interaction is an important safety concern, we provide here an overview of the clinical data regarding the interaction between this herbal remedy and prescribed drugs. Reviews on St John’s wort–drug interactions can be found elsewhere (6,14).
INFLUENCE OF ST JOHN’S WORT ON CYTOCHROME P450 ENZYMES AND P-GLYCOPROTEIN
Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are common sites of drug interactions in human. Drugs may act as inhibitors or inducers of CYPs, leading to altered clearance of a second drug (15). Strong evidence from animal studies as well as preclinical and clinical studies suggests that SJW may modulate CYP activity. Using well-established probe drugs (e.g., alprazolam and midazolam for CYP3A4, caffeine for CYP1A2, chlorzoxazone for CYP2E1, dextromethorphan and debrisoquine for CYP2D6, tolbutamide for CYP2C9, and omeprazole for CYP2C19), a number of clinical trials have consistently shown that SJW induces CYP3A4, CYP2E1, and CYP2C19, with no effect on CYP1A2, CYP2D6, or CYP2C9 (16–30). Some authors have also suggested that SJW may induce CYP1A2 only in females (24). The effect of St John’s wort on CYP3A4 has been investigated more in detail. The effect of SJW on midazolam pharmacokinetics was considerably less evident after intravenous administration than after oral administration (22,25). These results suggest that the primary site of action of SJW is the intestinal—rather than hepatic—CYP3A4. Also, Imai and colleagues found that the in vivo CYP3A4 activity returned progressively to the basal level approximately 1 week after cessation of SJW, with an estimated half-life of 46.2 h (29). Hyperforin is the chemical ingredient of SJW-induced interactions. Indeed, this phloroglucinol derivative has been demonstrated to be a potent ligand for the nuclear receptor that regulates the expression of CYP3A4 (31).
P-glycoprotein, one of the most clinically important transmembrane transporters in humans, is encoded by the ABCB1/MDR1 gene. P-glycoprotein is located on the apical surface of intestinal epithelial cells, bile canaliculi, renal tubular cells, and placenta and the luminal surface of capillary endothelial cells in the brain and testes. The specific localization of P-glycoprotein suggests an active role in drug elimination and absorption (32). SJW has been shown to induce P-glycoprotein expression in intestinal isolated cells (33) as well as in the human intestine in healthy volunteers (34). Accordingly, SJW has been shown to lower plasma concentration of well-known P-glycoprotein substrates, including digoxin (35–37), fexofenadine (25,27), and talinolol (38). The effect on probe substrates was associated to increased MDR1 mRNA as well as P-glycoprotein levels in the human intestinal mucosa (38).
The effect of SJW on P-glycoprotein or CYP enzymes is generally observed after long treatment [ten or more days (25,27,35,39); data with treatment for lesser numbers of days (i.e., 4–9 days) are not available] with studies reporting no effect (or even nonclinically relevant stimulating effects) following acute (1–3 days) SJW administration (19,40). Effects on CYP or P-glycoprotein after SJW treatment in the 4–9-day range are not available. In addition, the extent of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein induction was found to be comparable among a number of ethnic groups, namely Caucasians, Africans, Americans, Hispanics, Chinese, Indians, and Malays (27).
The relative importance of hyperforin, one of the active ingredient of St John’s wort, on CYP and P-glycoprotein expression has been evaluated also in clinical trials (21,41–45). Hyperforin is a potent inducer of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (46). Clinical results suggest that the hyperforin content determines the magnitude of St John’s wort interactions, since extracts with low hyperforin content had a weak or no effect on both CYP and P-glycoprotein probe drugs (21,41–45). Thus, clinical trials have reported that St John’s wort extracts with low hyperforin content did not change the pharmacokinetic of alprazolam and midazolam (CYP3 substrate) (21,43), tolbutamide (CYP2C9 substrate) (21), digoxin (P-glycoprotein substrate) (21), cyclosporine (metabolized by CYP3A4 and effluxed by P-glycoprotein) (41), ethinylestradiol, and desogestrel, components of oral contraceptive pills (45).
CONVENTIONAL DRUGS AFFECTED BY ST JOHN’S WORT
SJW has been shown to clinically interact with a number of drugs (Tables II and III), including immunosuppressants, contraceptives, cardiovascular, anti-HIV and anticancer drugs, anxiolytics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, anesthetics, drugs used in addicted patients (e.g., methadone), muscle relaxing agents, drugs acting on the respiratory system, hypoglycemic, antimicrobic, and antimigraine medicines as well as drugs acting on the gastrointestinal tract. These interactions are discussed below.
Table II.
Case Reports and Case Series Reporting Interactions Between St John’s Wort and Prescribed Drugs
| Prescribed drug (reference) | SJW extract, dosage/duration | Sex (M/F)/age (years) | Clinical result of interaction | Possible mechanism | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrenergic vasopressors (ephedrine 50 mg and phenylephrine 1 mg, bolus) (107) | NR, 6 months | F/23 | Decreased responsiveness to vasopressors | Unknown (SJW might theoretically reduce the expression of adrenergic receptors) | The possibility that the anesthetic alone may have caused hypotension cannot be ruled out |
| Anesthetics (fentanyl, propofol, sevoflurane in O2, and N2O) (110) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 500–1,000 mg tid for 3 months | F/21 | Delayed emergence | Unknown | The American Society of Anesthesiologists advises that the use of SJW should be discontinued 2 or 3 weeks before surgery |
| Bupropion (110) | NR, 300 mg once a day for several years | F/58 | Persistent orofacial dystonia | Additive effect on 5-HT reuptake | It is not recommended to use SJW in combination with 5-HT reuptake inhibitors or 5-HT ligands |
| Buspirone and fluoxetine (96) | NR | F/42 | Hypomanic episode, with prominent anxious features and underlying depression | Additive effect on 5-HT signaling | The cases were complicated by the concomitant use of fluoxetine (one case) or Ginkgo biloba (both cases) |
| Buspirone (95) | Hypericum 2000 plus®—3 capsules daily for 2 months | F/27 | Serotonin syndrome | Additive effect on 5-HT signaling | |
| Cyclosporine (47) | NR, 300 mg bid | F/61 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels; rejection episode | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | Physicians should be aware of this interaction (which causes acute rejection episode) when treating patients with cyclosporine |
| Cyclosporine (47) | NR, 300 mg tid | F/54 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (48) | NR | 30 patients, NR | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels (47%) | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (49) | NR | 10 patients, NR | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels (49%); rejection episode in 1 patient | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (50) | Extract, 300 to 900 mg daily | 5 patients, NR | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Tea: NR | |||||
| Cyclosporine (51) | NR | F/mid-20s | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels (75%) | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (52) | LI 160, 300 mg tid for 3 weeks | NR/61 | Lowering of plasma cyclosporine levels to 95 g/L; rejection episodes | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (52) | LI 160, 300 mg tid for 3 weeks | NR/63 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels to 87 g/L; rejection episode | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (53) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300–600 mg/daily for 2 months | F/29 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine (from 250–300 to 155 ng/mL): moderate to severe refection episode | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (54) | Jarsin® 300 mg/daily for 4 weeks | F/55 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine, (from 131 to 74 ng/mL) | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (55) | NR, 2× 900 mg/day for 2 weeks | M/63 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels; rejection episode | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (56) | NR, for 3 days | F/38 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine (from 147 to 39.7 ng/mL) | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (57) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin | F/44 and M/29 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine; acute rejection episode in M/29 | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| F/44, 600–900 mg/daily for 6 months | |||||
| M/29, 300–600 mg/daily for 30 days | |||||
| Cyclosporine (58) | NR, for 2–5 weeks | 3 patients, NR | Lowering of blood cyclosporine (<100 ng/mL) | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (59) | Neuroplant®, 300 mg tid for 5 years | F/55 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine (81 ng/mL) | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (60) | NR, 300 mg bid for 26 days | M/58 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels (from 200 to 67 µg/L) | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Cyclosporine (61) | Herbal tea mixture containing SJW, NR | M/57 | Lowering of blood cyclosporine levels (from from 100–130 to 70 µg/L) | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| Eletriptan (119) | NR, for 1 month | F/28 | Serotonin syndrome | Additive effect on 5-HT signaling | The patient also took fluoxetine, which probably predisposed the patient to develop the syndrome precipitated by subsequent use of eletriptan |
| Loperamide (122) | NR | F/39 | Brief episode of acute delirium (disoriented, agitated, confused state) | Unknown | If confirmed, such interaction is potentially dangerous |
| Nefazodone (97) | NR, 300 mg tid for 3 days | F/84 | Nausea, vomiting, headache | Additive effect on 5-HT reuptake | The syndrome could be fatal particularly in the elderly |
| Nevirapine (87) | NR, for several months | 5 M/range from 34 to 53 | Decreased plasma concentration of nevirapine | Induction of CYP (CYP3A4) | SJW may render ineffective nevirapine treatment |
| Oral contraceptive (67) | NR | F/NR | Changed menstrual bleeding | Induction of CYP3A4 | Physicians should be aware of this interaction. Changes in the pharmacokinetic of oral contraceptive pills can result in reduced efficacy and increased breakthrough bleeding |
| Oral contraceptive (67) | NR | 8 F/range from 23 to 31 | Intermenstrual bleeding | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| OC: ethinylestradiol desogestrel (47) | NR | F/NR | Intermenstrual (breakthrough) bleeding | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| OC: ethinylestradiol desogestrel (47) | NR | F/NR | Intermenstrual (breakthrough) bleeding | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| OC: ethinylestradiol desogestrel (47) | NR | F/44 | Intermenstrual (breakthrough) bleeding | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| OC, Valette® (70) | NR, 1,700 mg daily for 3 months | F/36 | Unwanted pregnancy | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| Paroxetine (98) | NR, 600 mg/day for 10 days | F/50 | Nausea, weakness, fatigue, groggy, and lethargic state | Additive effect on 5-HT reuptake | The syndrome could be fatal particularly in the elderly |
| Phenprocoumon (47) | NR | F/75 | Increased “Quick-Wert test” (indicating decreased anticoagulant effect) | Induction of CYP3A4 and possibly other CYP isoforms | The decreased plasma levels of phenprocoumon could be clinically relevant |
| Prednisone (65) | NR | F/36 | Maniac episode | Unknown | A clinical trial did not confirm this interaction (66) |
| Sertraline (97) | NR | F/78 | Dizziness, nausea, vomiting, headache | Additive effect on 5-HT reuptake | The syndrome could be fatal particularly in the elderly |
| Sertraline (97) | NR | M/64 | Nausea, epigastric pain, anxiety | Additive effect on 5-HT reuptake | |
| Sertraline (97) | NR, 300 mg bid for 2 days | M/82 | Nausea, vomiting, anxiety, confusion | Additive effect on 5-HT reuptake | |
| Sertraline (97) | NR, 300 mg tid for 2 days | M/79 | Nausea, anxiety, feelings of restlessness, and irritability | Additive effect on 5-HT reuptake | |
| Sertraline (100) | Dosage unclear: for 5 weeks | M/28 | Manic episode | Additive effect on 5-HT reuptake | |
| Tacrolimus (62) | Neuroplant®—600 mg/daily for 1 month | M/65 | Decreased tacrolimus levels | Induction of CYP3A4 | Physicians should be aware of this interaction (which causes acute rejection episode) |
| Theophylline (114) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300 mg/daily for 2 months | F/42 | Decreased theophylline levels | Induction of CYP2E1 and CY3A4 | A clinical trial did not confirm this interaction (115) |
| Tibolone (73) | NR: infusion 2 g/daily for 10 weeks | F/57 | Acute hepatitis | Unknown | In absence of evidence of a potential role for concomitant medication, an interaction between SJW and tibolone was suspected as likely case of liver damage |
| Tryptophan (112) | NR | M/19 | Serotonin syndrome (agitation, anxiety, tremors) | Additive effects (tryptophan may increase central serotonin levels) | The case was complicated by the use of an unknown antitussive drug |
| Venlafaxine (99) | Tincture, 200 gtt tid; usual dose 160 daily | M/32 | Serotonin syndrome | Additive effect on 5-HT reuptake | The syndrome could be fatal particularly in the elderly |
| Warfarin (67) | NR | F/79 | Decreased INR (from 2.5–3.8 to 1.7) | Induction of CYP3A4 and possibly other CYP isoforms | The decreased plasma levels of warfarin could be clinically relevant |
| Warfarin (67) | NR | M/65 | Decreased INR (from 2.4–3.6 to 2.0–2.1) | Induction of CYP3A4 and possibly other CYP isoforms | |
| Warfarin (67) | NR | M/76 | Decreased INR (from 2.6 to 1.1) | Induction of CYP3A4 and possibly other CYP isoforms | |
| Warfarin (67) | NR | F/61 | Decreased INR (INR before treatment not available; INR after 1.2) | Induction of CYP3A4 and possibly other CYP isoforms | |
| Warfarin (67) | NR | F/84y | Decreased INR (from 2.9–3.6 to 1.5) | Induction of CYP3A4 and possibly other CYP isoforms | |
| Warfarin (67) | NR | F/56 | Decreased INR (from 2.6 to 1.5) | Induction of CYP3A4 and possibly other CYP isoforms | |
| Warfarin (67) | NR | F/85 | Decreased INR (from 2.1–4.1 to 1.5) | Induction of CYP3A4 and possibly other CYP isoforms |
NR not reported, bid twice daily, CYP cytochrome, INR international normalized ratio, tid three times daily, OC oral contraceptive, SJW St John’s wort, 5-HT 5-hydroxytryptamine
Table III.
Clinical Trials Reporting Interactions Between St John’s Wort and Prescribed Drugs
| Prescribed drug (reference) | SJW extract, dosage/duration | Sample size | Clinical result of interaction | Possible mechanism | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alprazolam (19) | Solaray®, 300 mg tid for 3 days | 4 males | No significant effect on plasma alprazolam (T max, C max, and AUC) | No effect on CYP3A4 after 3 days SJW | The interaction occurs only at therapeutic dose of SJW (300 mg tid for at least 10 days) |
| 3 females | |||||
| Alprazolam (20) | Kira®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 6 males | Decreased alprazolam AUC and half-life | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| 6 females | |||||
| Alprazolam (21) | Esbericum®, 1 capsule (60 mg extract) bid for 10 days | 18 males | Marginal influence of alprazolam pharmacokinetics | Weak or no induction of CYP3A with a SJW extract with low hyperforin content | |
| 10 females | |||||
| Amitriptyline (102) | LI160, Jarsin®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 3 males | Decreased amitriptyline AUC | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or induction of P-glycoprotein | Physicians should be aware of this interaction when treating patients with amitriptyline |
| 9 females | |||||
| Atorvastatin (79) | Movina®, 300 mg bid for 4 weeks | 10 males | Reduced efficacy of atorvastatin | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or induction of P-glycoprotein | SJW should not be given concomitantly to statins which are cytochrome P-450 or P-glycoprotein substrates |
| 6 females | |||||
| All hypercholesterolemic | |||||
| Carbamazepine (103) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 5 males | No changes in carbamazepine pharmacokinetics | None | Carbamazepine is also metabolized by other CYP isoforms, such as CYP2C8. This may explain the lack of interaction |
| 3 females | |||||
| Caffeine (22) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 900 mg single dose or 300 mg tid for 14 days | 7 males | No effect on caffeine pharmacokinetics | No effect on CYP1A2 | Clinical trials consistently show that SJW has a weak or no effect on caffeine pharmacokinetics |
| 5 females | |||||
| Caffeine (21) | Esbericum®, 1 capsule (60 mg extract) bid for 10 days | 18 males | Marginal influence of caffeine pharmacokinetics | Weak or no induction of CYP1A2 with a SJW extract with low hyperforin content | |
| 10 females | |||||
| Caffeine (23) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin and 4% hyperforin, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 12 males | No effect on caffeine metabolism | No effect on CYP1A2 | |
| Caffeine (24) | Jarsin®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | Increased caffeine metabolic ratios in saliva (only in females) | CYP1A2 induction in female only | |
| 8 females | |||||
| Caffeine (18) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300 mg tid for 28 days | 6 males | Increased (26%) paraxanthine/caffeine serum ratios | Weak induction of CYP1A2 | |
| 6 females | |||||
| Caffeine (17) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300 mg tid for 28 days | 6 males | No changes in paraxanthine/caffeine serum ratios | No effect on CYP1A2 | |
| 6 females | |||||
| Chlorzoxazone (18) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300 mg tid for 28 days | 6 males | Strong increase (110%) in hydroxychlorzoxazone/chlorzoxazone ratio | Strong induction of CYP2E1 | The therapeutic manifestation of such interaction has been not determined |
| 6 females | |||||
| Chlorzoxazone (17) | Extract standardized to hypericin 0.3%, 300 mg tid for 28 days | 6 males | Increased hydroxychlorzoxazone/chlorzoxazone serum ratios | Induction of CYP2E1 | |
| 6 females | |||||
| Cyclosporine (25) | LI160, 300 mg tid for 12 days | 10 males | Increased cyclosporine clearance | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | Physicians should be aware of this interaction when treating patients with cyclosporine |
| 10 females | |||||
| Cyclosporine (41) | 300 mg tid for 14 days. Two preparation were used: low (0.1 mg/capsule) and high (7.0 mg/capsule) hyperforin content | 9 males | Decreased AUC. Effect more pronounced for the high hyperforin content extract | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| 1 female | |||||
| All renal transplant patients | |||||
| Debrisoquine (18) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300 mg tid for 28 days | 6 males | Increased (23%) debrisoquine urinary recovery ratios; | Weak induction of CYP2D6 | SJW does not affect the pharmacokinetics of CYP2D6 substrates |
| 6 females | |||||
| Debrisoquine (17) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300 mg tid for 28 days | 6 males | No changes in debrisoquine urinary recovery ratios | No effect on CYP2D6 | |
| 6 females | |||||
| Debrisoquine (16) | Extract standardized to 3% hyperforin, 300 mg tid 14 days | 8 males | No effect on debrisoquine urinary recovery ratios | Not applicable (no effect on CYP2D6) | |
| 8 females | |||||
| Dextromethorphan (19) | Solaray®, 300 mg tid for 3 days | 4 males | No effect on dextromethorphan pharmacokinetics | No effect on CYP3A4 after 3-days SJW | SJW does not affect the pharmacokinetics of CYP2D6 substrates |
| 3 females | |||||
| Dextromethorphan (22) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 900 mg single dose or 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | No effect on dextromethorphan pharmacokinetics | No effect on CYP2D6 | |
| 5 females | |||||
| Dextromethorphan (26) | Extract standardized to 3% hyperforin, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 4 males | No significant changes in dextromethorphan– dextrorphan ratio | No effect on CYP2D6 | |
| 9 females | |||||
| Dextromethorphan (20) | Kira®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 6 males | No significant changes in dextromethorphan excretion | No effect on CYP 2D6 | |
| 6 females | |||||
| Dextromethorphan (24) | Jarsin®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | No changes in dextromethorphan urinary excretion | No effect on CYP2D6 | |
| 8 females | |||||
| Digoxin (35) | LI 160, 300 mg tid for 10 days | 13 males | Decreased plasma digoxin concentration–trough concentration (33.3%), AUC (25%), and C max (26%) | Induction of P-glycoprotein | Physicians should be aware of this interaction when treating patients with digoxin |
| 12 females | |||||
| Digoxin (36) | Various preparations, including powder, tea, juice, and extract LI160 for 14 days | 96 healthy volunteers | Decreased plasma digoxin concentration (AUC, C max, C trough) | Induction of P-glycoprotein | |
| Digoxin (21) | Esbericum®, 1 capsule (60 mg extract) bid for 10 days | 15 males | Marginal influence on digoxin pharmacokinetics | Weak or no effect on P-glycoprotein with an extract with low hyperforin content | |
| 13 females | |||||
| Digoxin (16) | SJW (extract standardized to 3% hyperforin) 300 mg tid for 14 days | 9 males | Significant reductions in AUC0–3 (28%), AUC10–24 (23%), and C max (36%) | Induction of P-glycoprotein | |
| 9 females | |||||
| Digoxin (37) | LI160, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | Decreased (18%) digoxin AUC | Induction of P-glycoprotein | |
| Erythromycin (37) | LI160, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | Increased metabolism of erythromycin (as revealed by 14C-erythromycin breath test) | Induction of CYP3A4 | The clinical manifestation of such interaction remain to be determined |
| Fexofenadine (39) | SJW (extract standardized to hypericin 0.3%) single dose 900 mg or 300 mg tid for 14 days | 9 males | Increased fexofenadine maximum plasma concentration after 1-day St John’s administration. No effect after 14 days | Transient inhibition of P-glycoprotein after 1-day SJW administration | The transient inhibition of P-glycoprotein is clinically irrelevant |
| 3 females | |||||
| Fexofenadine (25) | LI160, 300 mg tid for 12 days | 10 males | Increased fexofenadine clearance | Induction of P-glycoprotein | |
| 10 females | |||||
| Fexofenadine (27) | SJW (unspecified extract) 300 mg tid for 10 days | 20 males | Decreased plasma concentration of fexofenadine | Induction of P-glycoprotein | |
| 8 females | |||||
| Gliclazide (116) | LI160, 300 mg tid for 15 days | 15 males | Decreased gliclazide AUC0–∞, t 1/2, and apparent clearance | The mechanism seems independent of CYP2C9 genotype | The therapeutic manifestation of such interaction was not determined |
| 6 females | |||||
| Imatinib (91) | LI160, 300 mg tid for 14 d | 6 males | Decreased imatinib AUC, t 1/2, and C max | Induction of CYP3A4 | Clinicians should be aware that SJW may reduce imatinib exposure by 30–40% and should take appropriate action to educate patients receiving imatinib |
| 6 females | |||||
| Imatinib (92) | SJW (HBC Inc, Los Angeles) 300 mg tid for 14 days | 10 volunteers | Decreased imatinib AUC0–∞, C max, and t 1/2 | Induction of CYP3A4 and or P-glycoprotein | |
| Indinavir (85) | SJW (extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin) 300 mg tid for 16 days | 6 males | Decreased indinavir AUC (57%) | Induction of CYP3A4 | Low plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors are a cause of antiretroviral resistance and treatment failure |
| 2 females | |||||
| Irinotecan (90) | SJW (Bio Nutrition Health Products, The Netherlands) 300 mg tid for 18 days | 2 males | Decrease (42%) plasma levels of SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan) | Induction of CYP3A4 | The decreased plasma levels of SN-38 may have a deleterious impact on treatment outcome |
| 3 females | |||||
| All cancer patients | |||||
| Ivabradine (83) | Jarsin®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 6 males | Decreased ivabradine AUC and C max | Induction of CYP3A4 | No pharmacodynamic effect was observed |
| 6 females | |||||
| Mephenytoin (23) | SJW (extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin and 4% hyperforin) 300 mg tid for 14 days | 12 males | Increased urinary excretion of mephenytoin metabolites | Induction of CYP2C19 | SJW affects the pharmacokinetics of other CYP2C19 substrates such as omeprazole and voriconazole |
| Methadone (109) | Jarsin®, 900 mg/daily for 31 days | 2 males | Decreased methadone plasma concentration | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | Possibility of a withdrawal syndrome |
| 2 females | |||||
| All addict patients | |||||
| Mycophenolic acid (64) | Jarsin®, 300 mg bid for 14 days | 6 males | No changes in mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics | None | Mycophenolic acid is not a CYP or P-glycoprotein substrate |
| 4 females | |||||
| All transplant patients | |||||
| Midazolam (22) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 900 mg single dose or 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | Decreased oral midazolam AUC after long term (14 days) but not short term (1 day) SJW administration | Selective induction of intestinal CYP3A | The therapeutic manifestation of such interaction was not determined |
| 5 females | |||||
| Midazolam (18) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300 mg tid for 28 days | 6 males | Increased (98%) hydroxymidazolam/midazolam serum ratios | Strong induction of CYP3A4 (sexual dimorphysm greater increase in female than in males) | |
| 6 females | |||||
| Midazolam (25) | LI160, 300 mg tid for 12 days | 10 males | Increased midazolam clearance (more evident after oral administration) | Induction of intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4 | |
| 10 females | |||||
| Midazolam (28) | Commercial extract (Rexall-Sundown Pharmaceutical, Boca Raton), 300 mg tid for 21 consecutive days during the second menstrual cycle and for 21 consecutive days during the third menstrual cycle | 12 females | Increased oral (but not systemic) clearance of midazolam | Selective induction of intestinal CYP3A4 | |
| Midazolam (27) | Unspecified extract, 300 mg tid for 10 days | 20 males | Decreased plasma concentration of midazolam | Induction of intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4 | |
| 8 females | |||||
| Midazolam (17) | Extract standardized to hypericin 0.3%, 300 mg tid for 28 days | 6 males | Increased hydroxymidazolam/midazolam serum ratios | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| 6 females | |||||
| Midazolam (42) | Six preparation containing different amounts of hyperforin, 2.68–41.25 mg hyperforin/daily for 14 days | 42 males | Decreased midazolam AUC (maximal effect for extracts with high hyperforin content) | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| Midazolam (43) | Extract containing low hyperforin content (0.06 mg/capsule mg) 1 capsule (500 mg) bid for 14 days | 20 males | Slight decreased midazolam AUC0–8. No change in midazolam C max, t 1/2, and T max | Weak or no effect with SJW extracts containing low amounts of hyperforin | |
| Midazolam (29) | TruNature®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 12 healthy volunteers | Increased apparent oral clearance of midazolam | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| Nevirapine (44) | SJW (2 g infusion bid for 14 days, low amount of hyperforin) | 36 females | No effect on nevirapine half-life | No enzymatic induction (CYP3A4 and CYP2B6) with SJW tea containing low amounts of hyperforin | SJW may render ineffective nevirapine if used at therapeutic dosage |
| Nifedipine (80) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin and 5% hyperforin, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 5 males | Decreased nifedipine AUC0–∞ | Induction of CYP3A4 | The therapeutic manifestation of such interaction has been not determined |
| 5 females | |||||
| Omeprazole (30) | Extract standardized to hypericin 0.3%, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 12 males | Decreased omeprazole AUC0–∞ and C max | Induction of CYP2C19 | SJW affects the pharmacokinetics of other CYP2C19 substrates such as mephenytoin and voriconazole |
| Oral contraceptive (ethinylestradiol, norethindrone) (28) | Commercial extract (Rexall-Sundown Pharmaceutical, Boca Raton), 300 mg tid for 21 consecutive days during the second menstrual cycle and for 21 consecutive days during the third menstrual cycle | 12 females | Increased clearance of norethindrone and reduction in the half-life of ethinylestradiol; increased breakthrough bleeding | Induction of CYP3A4 | Changes in the pharmacokinetic of oral pill can result in reduced efficacy and Increased breakthrough bleeding. No effect was observed in a trial in which a SJW extract with low hyperforin was used (45) |
| Oral contraceptive (ethinylestradiol, desogestrel) (68) | Ze 117, Jarsin®, 300 mg tid for 21 consecutive days during the second menstrual cycle and for 21 consecutive days during the third menstrual cycle | 18 females | Decreased AUC0–24 and C max of 3-ketodesogestrel, but not of ethinylestradiol; increased intracyclic bleeding | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| Oral contraceptive (ethinylestradiol, norethindrone) (69) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin and 3.7% hyperforin, 300 mg tid for eight weeks (during cycles 3 and 4) | 16 females | Increased metabolism of norethindrone and ethinylestradiol | Induction of CYP3A4 | |
| Increased breakthrough bleeding | |||||
| Oral contraceptive (ethinylestradiol, desogestrel) (45) | Ze 117, 250 mg bid for 14 days | 26 females | No changes in oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics | No enzymatic induction with an extract with low hyperforin content | |
| Phenprocoumon (77) | LI160, 300 mg/daily for 11 days | 10 males | Decreased phenprocoumon AUC (17.4%) | CYP induction | The decreased plasma levels of phenprocoumon could be clinically relevant |
| Pravastatin (78) | TruNature®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | No significant effect on plasma pravastatin levels | None | Pravastatin is not a CYP or P-glycoprotein substrate |
| Prednisone (66) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 300 mg tid for 28 days | 8 males | No changes in prednisone pharmacokinetics | None | One case of maniac episode has been reported (65) |
| Quazepam (94) | TruNature®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 13 males | Decreased C max and AUC0–48 | Induction of CYP3A4 | Physicians should be aware of this interaction when treating patients with quazepam |
| Simvastatin (78) | TruNature®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | Decreased plasma levels of simvastatin | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | The therapeutic manifestation of such interaction was not determined |
| Tacrolimus (64) | Jarsin®, 300 mg bid for 14 days | 6 males | Decreased AUC0–12 of tacrolimus, but not of mycophenolic acid | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | Physicians should be aware of this interaction because of risk of rejection episodes |
| 4 females | |||||
| Tacrolimus (63) | Extract containing 440 μg hypericin/300 mg extract, 300 mg tid for 18 days | 8 males | Decreased tacrolimus AUC | Induction of CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein | |
| 2 females | |||||
| Talinolol (38) | Jarsin®, 300 mg tid for 12 days | 9 males | Reduction of talinolol AUC after oral administration | Induction of intestinal P-glycoprotein | SJW is known to affect the pharmacokinetic of P-glycoprotein probes |
| Theophylline (115) | TruNature®, 300 mg tid for 15 days | 12 males | No significant changes in theophylline pharmacokinetics | None | Although this study reported negative results, a case of decreased theophylline levels in a patient taking SJW has been reported (114) |
| Tolbutamide (22) | Extract standardized to 0.3% hypericin, 900 mg single dose or 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | No effect on tolbutamide pharmacokinetics | No effect on CYP2C9 | SJW does not modify the pharmacokinetics of CYP2C9 probe drugs |
| 5 females | |||||
| Tolbutamide (21) | Esbericum®, 1 capsule (60 mg extract) bid for 10 days | 15 males | Marginal influence on tolbutamide pharmacokinetics | Weak or no effect on CYP2C9. However, an extract with low hyperforin content has been used | |
| 13 females | |||||
| Verapamil (81) | Movina®, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 8 males | Decreased AUC (78–80%) of R- and S-verapamil | Induction of intestinal CYP3A4 | Physicians should be aware of this interaction |
| Voriconazole (40) | LI160, 300 mg tid for 14 days | 16 males | Increased AUC (22%) after 10 h, decreased AUC (59%) after 14 days SJW | CYP2C19 modulation | SJW affects the pharmacokinetics of other CYP2C19 substrates such as omeprazole and mephenytoin |
| Warfarin (76) | SJW, a tablet tid for 2 weeks (each tablet contained standardized dry extract equivalent to 1 g H. perforatum flowering herb top, 0.825 mg hypericin, and 12.5 mg hyperforin) | 12 males | Increased warfarin clearance and decreased INR | Induction of CYP3A4 and possibly other CYP isoforms | The decreased plasma levels of warfarin could be clinically relevant |
AUC area under the plasma concentration/time curve, bid twice daily, tid three times daily, quid four times, CYP cytochrome, C max maximum plasma concentration times daily, T max time to maximum plasma concentration, SJW St John’s wort, INR international normalized ratio, CYP cytochrome P450
Immunosuppressants
The importance of unrecognized interactions between SJW and immunosuppressants is particularly relevant in transplant recipients as serious consequences have occurred. The interaction between SJW and cyclosporine is the most well documented among herb–drug interactions, as it has been highlighted by multiple case reports, case series (47–61), and clinical trials (25,41). A number of heart, renal, or liver transplant patients stabilized on cyclosporine showed decreased blood levels (associated, in some cases, with acute rejection episodes) after taking SJW at therapeutic dosage. The clinical picture improved in all cases following discontinuation of the herbal extract (60). Cyclosporine is a substrate of P-glycoprotein, and it is also metabolized by CYP3A4.
Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug frequently used after renal transplantation. Low tacrolimus blood levels may result in rejection episodes with the risk of graft loss, whereas high tacrolimus levels may be associated with nephrotoxicity. Therefore, drug interactions with tacrolimus are of special interest. A 65-year-old renal transplant patient showed its plasma tacrolimus levels to be sharply decreased after 1 month self-treatment with SJW extract. Tacrolimus levels returned to the previous range of concentrations after stopping SJW assumption (62). This clinical case has been confirmed by two trials showing decreased tacrolimus area under the curve (AUC) both in healthy volunteers (63) and in renal transplant patients (64). In the latter study (64), dose increases were required to maintain therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations. Notably, SJW was found to decrease the blood concentrations of tacrolimus (a CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrate), but not of mycophenolic acid (mainly glucuronidated by UGT1A9 and 2B7) (64).
Prednisone is a well-known glucocorticoid that has been relied upon in the treatment of immune-exacerbated conditions. A case of mania due to coadministration of SJW and prednisone has been reported (65). Both SJW and prednisone may cause mania when administered alone. In this case, causality needs to be established since the patient was a cocaine and alcohol abuser. Notably, SJW had no effect on prednisone pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers (66).
Hormonal Therapy
Several cases of intermenstrual bleeding have been reported in young woman on oral contraceptives after taking SJW for as little as 1 week (46,67). This adverse event has been observed also in clinical studies (28,68,69) that have shown a higher incidence of intracyclic bleeding episodes after coadministration of SJW and oral contraceptive pills. Most importantly, reports of women becoming pregnant while using oral contraceptives and SJW have been reported by UK, German, and Swedish authorities. Furthermore, a detailed clinical case of unwanted pregnancy in a depressed 36-year-old woman has been reported (70). The patient began self-medication with St John’s wort for approximately 3 months prior to conception, and until conception, no other medication was taken except the hormonal contraceptive (ethinylestradiol/dienogesterol).
Both intermenstrual bleeding and reduced efficacy are believed to be due to the reduced plasma concentration of the components of oral contraceptive pills by SJW. It is well known that drugs inducing CYP3A4 such as rifampicin may cause reduced efficacy of oral contraceptives and breakthrough bleeding (71). Clinical studies have shown that SJW increases the clearance of oral pill components such as ethinylestradiol, norethindrone, and ketodesogestrel, and this effect is associated to breakthrough bleeding (28,68,69); interestingly, SJW extracts with low hyperforin content were found not to alter the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and 3-ketodesogestrel, the hormonal components of the oral contraceptive (45). This further highlights the concept that hyperforin is the chemical ingredient responsible of SJW-induced pharmacokinetic interactions.
Tibolone, an analog of the progestin, norethynodrel, influences the synthesis and metabolism of endogenous estrogen, progesterone, and androgen. Tibolone is used for the treatment of menopausal symptoms and for the postponement and calming of symptoms accompanying age-related diseases (72). A case of a patient under tibolone therapy for 2 years who developed a mixed-type liver injury with prolonged cholestasis and features of the vanishing bile duct syndrome following a 10-week treatment with SJW has been reported (73). In the absence of evidence of a potential role for concomitant medication, an interaction between the herbal preparation and tibolone was suspected as the likely cause of liver damage
Anticoagulants
The anticoagulant warfarin has a narrow therapeutic index and represents the most investigated drug with respect to drug interactions (74). The anticoagulant exists as a racemic mixture of R- and S-enantiomers, with R-warfarin being metabolized mainly by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 and S-warfarin, which is more potent, predominantly by CYP2C19A (75). A clinical trial preformed in 12 healthy male subjects showed that SJW significantly induced the apparent clearance of both S-warfarin and R-warfarin, which, in turn, resulted in a significant reduction in the pharmacological effect of racemic warfarin (76). Similarly, another trial found that SJW decreased plasma levels of phenprocoumon (a coumarin anticoagulant chemically related to warfarin) (77). These clinical trials would explain the cases of decreased international normalized ratio observed following coadministration of SJW with warfarin (67) or phenprocoumon (47).
Antihyperlipidemic Drugs
The statins simvastatin and atorvastatin are metabolized by CYP34 and are also substrates for P-glycoprotein. Thus, there are clear possibilities for drug interaction with SJW. Accordingly, clinical studies have shown that SJW decreased plasma levels of simvastatin (but not pravastatin, which is not a substrate for CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein) in healthy volunteers (78) and reduced the efficacy of atorvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients (79). Specifically, SJW significantly increased the serum level of LDL cholesterol compared with control and increased the total cholesterol level (79). Physicians and patients should be aware of these interactions, and if treatment with SJW is considered necessary, then there may be a need for increasing the dose of statins.
Calcium Blockers
Nifedipine and verapamil, well-known calcium channel blockers used in the treatment of hypertension, are both metabolized by CYP3A. Clinical studies have shown that SJW decreased the AUC of both nifedipine (80) and verapamil (81) in healthy volunteers. The effect of SJW on verapamil bioavailability is caused by induction of first-pass CYP3A4 metabolism, most likely in the gut (81).
Beta Adrenergic Blockers
Talinolol is a beta1-adrenergic blocker used in essential hypertension and as an antiarrhythmic drug. Experimentally, talinolol is mostly used as a nonmetabolized in vivo probe for P-glycoprotein. In a controlled, randomized study (n = 9), a 12-day SJW treatment resulted in a 93% increase in oral clearance and a 31% reduction in AUC. Renal and nonrenal clearance (CLNR), elimination half-life (t1/2), peak serum drug concentration (Cmax), and time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were not significantly modified (38). SJW affected only CLNR of i.v. talinolol. The effects of SJW on oral talinolol pharmacokinetics were associated with increased MDR1 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) as well as P-glycoprotein levels in the duodenal mucosa (38). It was concluded that SJW has a major inductive effect on intestinal P-glycoprotein (38).
Antianginal Drugs
Ivabradine belongs to a new class of antianginal drugs, which have recently become available: the selective and specific I(f) inhibitors. The mode of action of this novel class involves selective and specific inhibition of the major pacemaker current in the sinoatrial node, the mixed sodium/potassium current (I(f)), which results in pure heart rate reduction (82). Ivabradine is extensively metabolized by intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4. A clinical study performed in healthy volunteers showed that administration of SJW significantly decreased ivabradine maximal plasma concentration (33 vs 15 ng/mL) and AUC (144 vs 44 ng h/mL) (83).
Cardiac Inotropic Drugs
Digoxin, a cardiac glycoside which originates from the Digitalis (foxglove) plant, is used in the treatment of heart failure. Drug interaction studies with digoxin are important because of its narrow therapeutic index. Digoxin is a substrate of P-glycoprotein. Two trials have shown a decreased in plasma concentration of digoxin following SJW administration (35,36). The effect occurred after at least 10-day coadministration (35), although the possibility that such interaction occurs after a treatment of less than 10 days cannot be ruled out (no time course of the digoxin plasma concentration was provided in the original papers). In accordance with an intestinal induction of P-glycoprotein, interaction was characterized by a reduction in AUC0–24 and Cmax, which lead to a reduction in Ctrough (36). Although the decreased of digoxin levels is believed to be clinically relevant, no therapeutic interactions between St John’s wort and digoxin have been reported to date.
Anti-HIV Drugs
Antiretroviral drugs, widely used to treat HIV infections, include protease inhibitors such as indinavir and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase such as nevirapine. Clinical trials have shown that SJW may interact with antiretroviral drugs leading to drug failure (84). An open-label study showed a large (AUC0–8 decreased by 57%) reduction in the plasma concentration of indinavir (CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrate) in six healthy volunteers taking SJW (85). One spontaneous case has been reported in the UK, in which the patient experienced an increase in HIV RNA viral load following the concomitant use of SJW and indinavir or lamivudine (86). Finally, de Maat and colleagues reported increased oral clearance of nevirapine (nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) following SJW wort coadministration in five HIV patients (87). Nevirapine metabolism is catalyzed by CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 (88).
Anticancer Drugs
In recent years, the use of herbal products in cancer patients has increased significantly, even concomitantly to conventional chemotherapeutic treatment (89). Considering the narrow therapeutic window of anticancer drugs, this use increases the risk of clinically relevant herb–anticancer drug interactions (89).
In an unblinded, randomized crossover study, five cancer patients were treated with irinotecan (a known substrate for CYP3A4 employed in the treatment of colorectal cancer) in the presence and absence of SJW (90). It was found that the plasma levels of the active metabolite SN-38 decreased by 42% following SJW cotreatment. Consequently, the degree of myelosuppression was substantially worse in the presence of SJW.
Two trials investigated the effect of SJW on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib—a potent inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl and c-kit tyrosine kinases that promote tumor cell proliferation. Imatinib is metabolized mainly by CYP3A4 and transported by P-glycoprotein, both induced by SJW. Both studies found increased imatinib clearance following SJW administration (91,92), suggesting that the herb may compromise the efficacy of the anticancer agent.
Benzodiazepines
The benzodiazepines alprazolam and midazolam are used experimentally as probe for CYP3A4 activity because they are entirely metabolized by intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4. Consistently, a number of clinical trials have shown that SJW decreased plasma levels of alprazolam (20) and midazolam (17,18,22,25,28,29,42) in healthy volunteers. Such effect is not observed with low hyperforin-containing extracts (21) or after a short (i.e., 3 days) period (19) of treatment. Quazepam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with significant effect on the induction and maintenance of sleep without major effect on sleep architecture (93). It is metabolized by both CYP3A4 and CYP2C19, which are both induced SJW. Accordingly, SJW, compared to placebo, decreased quazepam Cmax and AUC(0–48) in 13 healthy subjects (94).
Another anxiolytic drug which may interact with SJW is buspirone. Theoretically, the concomitant use of buspirone (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A receptor agonist) and SJW (inhibitor of 5-HT reuptake) may lead to an additive/synergistic effect on 5-HT signaling. A possible serotonin syndrome after combination of buspirone and SJW has been reported in a 27-year-old female with symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (95). Moreover, a 42-year-old female patient with a history of mild traumatic brain injury and resulting depression experienced hypomania after adding SJW and ginkgo to her regimen of buspirone and fluoxetine (a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor) (96). Remission was observed after discontinuation of the herbal medicines.
Antidepressant Drugs
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are a class of antidepressant used in the treatment of depression, anxiety, and personality disorders. They inhibit selectively the neuronal reuptake of 5-HT, leading to increased levels of the neurotransmitter available to bind the postsynaptic 5-HT receptor(s). Case series and case reports have shown that SJW interacts with 5-HT reuptake inhibitors such as paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and nefazodone resulting in symptoms of a central serotonin syndrome (97–99). Characteristic symptoms observed include mental status changes, tremor, autonomic instability, gastrointestinal upset, headache, myalgias, and motor restlessness. SSRI do not appear to be metabolized by CYP enzymes or P-glycoprotein. In these cases, a pharmacodynamic mechanism is postulated to be involved since both SJW and SSRI inhibit 5-HT reuptake.
A case of manic episode in a 28-year-old man taking both SJW and sertraline has been reported (100). According to the report reliability scale for drug interaction, the case was classified as possible (101), although it was complicated by concomitant testosterone replacement therapy following bilateral orchidectomy. It is unlikely that testosterone replacement itself could have contributed directly to the maniac episode, since plasma testosterone level was below the normal physiological range, despite replacement therapy (100).
The possible interaction between amitriptyline—a tricyclic antidepressant which may be used in depressive illness of psychotic or endogenous nature and in selected patients with neurotic depression—and SJW has been evaluated in an open-label trial (n = 12 depressed patients). SJW significantly decreased the amitriptyline and nortriptyline AUC by 22% and 41%, respectively. Cumulative urinary amounts of amitriptyline and metabolites decreased to the same extent as plasma concentrations upon SJW comedication (102). Amitriptyline clearance is primarily dependent on metabolism by a variety of CYP enzymes. Demethylation to nortriptyline proceeds with CYP2C19 and CYP3A; additionally, amitriptyline is a P-glycoprotein substrate.
Antiepileptic Drugs
The antiepileptic agent mephenytoin is primarily metabolized by CYP2C19. An open-label, placebo-controlled, crossover trial found that SJW increased the urinary 4′-hydroxymephenytoin excretion in CYP2C19 wild-genotype subjects, whereas no significant alteration was observed for CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (23). Another antiepileptic drug which has been evaluated for possible pharmacokinetic interaction with SJW is carbamazepine. Perhaps surprisingly, Burstein and colleagues found no significant differences before or after the administration of SJW in carbamazepine, a CYP3A4 substrate, and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide peak concentration, trough concentration, AUC, or oral clearance (103). It should be noted, however, that carbamazepine is also metabolized by other CYP isoforms, such as CYP2C8 (104). On the other hand, treatment of carbamazepine for 7 days resulted in a significant decrease of plasma concentration of pseudohypericin (105), one of the active ingredients of SJW (12,13). Although the effect was considered marginal, this trial reports an unusual case of interaction in which a synthetic drug affects the pharmacokinetics of an herbal extract active ingredient.
Anesthetic Drugs
Widespread use of herbal medications among the presurgical population may have a negative impact on perioperative patient care. Consequently, patients are asked to discontinue herbal product before surgery (106). A case of delayed emergence has been reported in a 21-year-old woman (107). Anesthesia was induced by fentanyl and propofol and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen and nitrous oxide. Using this treatment, total anesthesia time usually persists for approximately 10 min. Thirty minutes later, the patient was not roused, even when she was subjected to painful stimulation. At 90 min postanesthesia, the patient was easily rousable, with spontaneous eye opening. On the recovery, she denied taking any benzodiazepine, barbiturate, narcotic, or cannabinoid preoperatively, but she stated to have taken SJW for the preceding 3 months for depression on the advice of a herbalist. She had also increased the recommended dose after several weeks because of perceived lack of antidepressant effect. The mechanism of such interaction is presently unknown.
A possible cause of cardiovascular collapse during anesthesia has been reported in a 23-year-old woman (108). General anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol; d-tubocurarine and succinylcholine were used as muscle relaxants. Shortly after anesthesia induction, the patient became hypotensive, and subsequently, the patient was found to be weakly responsive to adrenergic vasopressors such as ephedrine and phenylephrine. In the recovery room, after the patient had fully emerged from anesthesia, she stated to have taken SJW for depression on a daily basis for the past 6 months. Before her previous surgery, she had not been taking SJW. Causality and mechanism of such interaction are unknown, although the authors speculated that SJW might theoretically reduce the expression of adrenergic receptors (108).
Drugs Used in Addicted Patients
Methadone is used in the controlled withdrawal of addicts from heroin. Methadone is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4, which is induced by St John’s wort. SJW reduced methadone concentration-to-dose ratios in four addict patients (109). Two patients reported symptoms that suggested a withdrawal syndrome. Bupropion is the first nonnicotine-based drug for smoking cessation (110). It exerts its effect primarily through the inhibition of dopamine reuptake into neuronal synaptic vesicles. A prolonged orofacial dystonia in a 58-year-old female following therapy with bupropion and SJW has been reported (111). The patient presented dystonic movements affecting the right side of her face, neck, and right arm. Her only other medications were SJW, which she had been taking for several years, and hormone replacement therapy. SJW inhibits the reuptake of a number of neurotransmitters, including dopamine. Thus, an additive effect on dopamine reuptake inhibition, making dopaminergic side effects, such as dystonia, is believed likely to occur in this case.
A case of serotonin syndrome resulting from coadministration of SJW and tryptophan, which a 19-year-old man used to “detox” himself from ecstasy, has been reported. Although it is unclear when he discontinued using ecstasy, his clinical presentation was temporally consistent with serotonin syndrome shortly after initiating self-directed therapy with tryptophan and SJW (112). Tryptophan is the precursor of 5-HT and hence might increase its brain levels.
Central Muscle Relaxant Agents
Chlorzoxazone is a centrally acting muscle relaxant used to treat muscle spasms and the resulting pain or discomfort. Two clinical trials, by the same authors, found an increase in hydroxychlorzoxazone/chlorzoxazone serum ratios, which is suggestive of CYP2E1 induction. The effect was found to be more pronounced in young rather than in elderly subjects (17,18).
Drugs Acting on the Respiratory System
Despite having been recognized for a long time as a cheap and effective therapy for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, theophylline is relegated to third-line therapy in the treatment of airway diseases due to the drug’s frequent side effects and relatively low efficacy (113). Theophylline is mainly metabolized by CYP1A2, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4. A case of decreased plasma levels of theophylline after taking SJW has been reported (114). This resulted in an increased dosage of theophylline to achieve therapeutic concentration. However, such possibility of interaction has been not confirmed by a clinical trial, in which it was shown that a 15-day administration of SJW did not affect the plasma and urine level of theophylline (115).
Fexofenadine is a nonsedating H1-receptor—selective, long-acting antihistaminic drug. Experimentally, fexofenadine is used as probe substrate for P-glycoprotein. Two clinical trials showed that SJW affected the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine (25,27). Dresser and colleagues found that 12 days’ treatment with SJW increased the oral clearance of fexofenadine in 21 young healthy subjects (25). In a different study, Wang and colleagues reported that a single dose of SJW significantly increased the maximum plasma concentration of fexofenadine by 45% and significantly decreased the oral clearance by 20%, with no change in half-life or renal clearance. Long-term administration of SJW did not cause a significant change in fexofenadine disposition relative to the untreated phase. Compared with the single-dose treatment phase, long-term SJW wort caused a significant 35% decrease in maximum plasma concentration and a significant 47% increase in fexofenadine oral clearance (27).
Finally, multiple clinical trials (19,20,22,24,26) have shown that SJW did not affect the pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan, a highly effective and widely used nonopioid antitussive drug.
Hypoglycemic Drugs
Tolbutamide is a CYP29 substrate which is therapeutically used in the management of type II diabetes. Two clinical trial showed that 10- or 14-day treatment with SJW did not alter tolbutamide AUC, Cmax, and Tmax (21,22). CYP2C9 is also the major contributor to the hypoglycemic drug gliclazide metabolism. A crossover controlled study was conducted in 21 healthy subjects, who received gliclazide either alone or during 15 days treatment with SJW. The study found that SJW significantly altered gliclazide pharmacokinetics—revealed by a decreased gliclazide AUC, t1/2, and apparent oral clearance—in all except for four healthy subjects (116). There were no significant changes in glucose or insulin AUC(0–4) after SJW treatment and no significant differences according to CYP2C9 genotype. Thus, treatment with SJW significantly increases the apparent clearance of gliclazide which is independent of CYP2C9 genotype. People with diabetes receiving this combination should be closely monitored to evaluate possible signs of reduced efficacy. The different effects of SJW on pharmacokinetics of oral tolbutamide and gliclazide could be due the potential contribution of CYP2C19 allelic variants.
Antimicrobics
Voriconazole is a triazole antifungal developed for the treatment of life-threatening fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. Voriconazole has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile with a wide inter- and intraindividual variety (117). The extensive metabolism of voriconazole is primarily mediated by CYP2C19 and CYP3A as well as by CYP2C9 to a lesser extent. In a controlled, open-label study, SJW slightly increased (after 10-h SJW intake) and strongly reduced (after 15-day SJW intake) voriconazole AUC (40).
The antibiotic drug erythromycin is a commonly used CYP3A4 probe for in vivo phenotypic enzyme activity evaluation using 14C erythromycin breath test. The test is performed by administering a trace amount of 14C-labeled erythromycin and thereafter evaluating the amount of exhaled 14CO2. Consistent with the ability of St John’s wort to induce CYP3A4, Dürr and colleagues found a 40% increase in the activity of hepatic CYP3A4 (37).
Antimigraine Drugs
Eletriptan is a second-generation 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist indicated for the acute treatment of migraine (118). A case of serotonin syndrome and rhabdomyolysis induced by concomitant use of eletriptan, fluoxetine, and SJW has been reported in a 28-year-old woman (119). The patient was admitted to hospital for sudden head deviation with loss of consciousness. On admission, she had been taking fluoxetine for 1 year and self-prescribed SJW pills for 1 month. In the previous 3 days before admission to hospital, she had taken eletriptan to treat recurrent migraine. The authors believe that SJW and fluoxetine predisposed the patient to develop serotonin syndrome precipitated by subsequent use of eletriptan.
Drugs Acting on the Gastrointestinal Tract
Omeprazole is a well-known proton pump inhibitor widely used for the treatment of various acid-related gastric disorders. In vivo, omeprazole is metabolized mainly by CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 to two major metabolites, 5-hydroxyomeprazole and omeprazole sulfate. CYP2C19 is the predominant enzyme involved in the 5-hydroxylation reaction, whereas CYP3A4 is the major enzyme-mediating sulfoxidation of omeprazole (120). After a 14-day treatment with SJW, substantial decreases in plasma concentrations of omeprazole were observed in a randomized crossover study (n = 12 healthy volunteers). SJW increased omeprazole sulfone and 5-hydroxyomeprazole Cmax and AUC0–∞. Thus, SJW induced both CYP3A4-catalyzed sulfoxidation and CYP2C19-dependent hydroxylation of omeprazole (30).
Loperamide is an antidiarrheal medication approved for the control of diarrhea symptoms and is available without a prescription. It is a phenylpiperidine derivative with a chemical structure similar to opiate receptor agonists that does not cross the blood–brain barrier (121). A brief episode of acute delirium, possibly induced by exposure to SJW, valerian, and loperamide has been reported (122). The mechanism of this interaction is presently unknown.
CONCLUSIONS
As far as we today know, St John’s wort represents the herbal product which is most involved in herb–drug interactions (8). Clinical evidence suggests that SJW may cause both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Pharmacokinetic interactions arise when SJW is combined with drugs which are CYP (3A4, 2E1, 2C19) and/or P-glycoprotein substrates. Among these, interactions between SJW and cyclosporine or anti-HIV drugs may have serious clinical consequences. Hyperforin is the chemical ingredient of SJW responsible for P-glycoprotein and cytochrome induction (21,46). Pharmacodynamic interactions may occur when SJW is combined with drugs which enhance 5-HT signaling in the brain. For example, SJW has been shown to cause serotonin syndrome when combined with serotonin reuptake inhibitors or with 5-HT receptor agonists. Healthcare professionals need to be aware of potential interactions between SJW and prescribed medicines.
References
- 1.Blumenthal M, Ferrier GKL, Cavaliere C. Total sales of herbal supplements in United States show steady growth. Herbal Gram. 2006;71:64–66. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bent S. Herbal medicine in the United States: review of efficacy, safety, and regulation: grand rounds at University of California, San Francisco Medical Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:854–859. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0632-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Izzo AA. Herb–drug interactions: an overview of the clinical evidence. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2005;19:1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.De Smet PA. Clinical risk management of herb–drug interactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:258–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02797.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Izzo AA. Drug interactions with St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum): a review of the clinical evidence. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;42:139–148. doi: 10.5414/cpp42139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou SF, Lai X. An update on clinical drug interactions with the herbal antidepressant St. John’s wort. Curr Drug Metab. 2008;9:394–409. doi: 10.2174/138920008784746391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kober M, Pohl K, Efferth T. Molecular mechanisms underlying St. John’s wort drug interactions. Curr Drug Metab. 2008;9:1027–1037. doi: 10.2174/138920008786927767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Di YM, Li CG, Xue CC, Zhou SF. Clinical drugs that interact with St. John’s wort and implication in drug development. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:1723–1742. doi: 10.2174/138161208784746798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Linde K, Berner M, Egger M, Mulrow C. St John’s wort for depression: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;186:99–107. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.2.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clement K, Covertson CR, Johnson MJ, Dearing K. St. John’s wort and the treatment of mild to moderate depression: a systematic review. Holist Nurs Pract. 2006;20:197–203. doi: 10.1097/00004650-200607000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Linde K, Berner MM, Kriston L. St John’s wort for major depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;CD000448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Di Carlo G, Borrelli F, Ernst E, Izzo AA. St John’s wort: prozac from the plant kingdom. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22:292–297. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01716-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Capasso F, Gaginella TS, Grandolini G, Izzo AA. Phytotherapy. A quick reference to herbal medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Whitten DL, Myers SP, Hawrelak JA, Wohlmuth H. The effect of St John’s wort extracts on CYP3A: a systematic review of prospective clinical trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62:512–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02755.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Trepanier LA. Cytochrome P450 and its role in veterinary drug interactions. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2006;36:975–985. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gurley BJ, Swain A, Hubbard MA, Williams DK, Barone G, Hartsfield F, Tong Y, Carrier DJ, Cheboyina S, Battu SK. Clinical assessment of CYP2D6-mediated herb–drug interactions in humans: effects of milk thistle, black cohosh, goldenseal, kava kava, St. John’s wort, and Echinacea. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52:755–763. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200600300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gurley BJ, Gardner SF, Hubbard MA, Williams DK, Gentry WB, Cui Y, Ang CY. Clinical assessment of effects of botanical supplementation on cytochrome P450 phenotypes in the elderly: St John’s wort, garlic oil, Panax ginseng and Ginkgo biloba. Drugs Aging. 2005;22:525–539. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200522060-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gurley BJ, Gardner SF, Hubbard MA, Williams DK, Gentry WB, Cui Y, Ang CY. Cytochrome P450 phenotypic ratios for predicting herb–drug interactions in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;72:276–287. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.126913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Markowitz JS, DeVane CL, Boulton DW, Carson SW, Nahas Z, Risch SC. Effect of St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) on cytochrome P-450 2D6 and 3A4 activity in healthy volunteers. Life Sci. 2000;66:PL133–39. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(99)00659-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, DeVane CL, Taylor RM, Ruan Y, Wang JS, Chavin KD. Effect of St John’s wort on drug metabolism by induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. JAMA. 2003;290:1500–1504. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.11.1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Arold G, Donath F, Maurer A, Diefenbach K, Bauer S, Henneicke-von Zepelin HH, Friede M, Roots I. No relevant interaction with alprazolam, caffeine, tolbutamide, and digoxin by treatment with a low-hyperforin St John’s wort extract. Planta Med. 2005;71:331–337. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-864099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang Z, Gorski JC, Hamman MA, Huang SM, Lesko LJ, Hall SD. The effects of St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) on human cytochrome P450 activity. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;70:317–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang LS, Zhu B, Abd El-Aty AM, Zhou G, Li Z, Wu J, Chen GL, Liu J, Tang ZR, An W, Li Q, Wang D, Zhou HH. The influence of St John’s Wort on CYP2C19 activity with respect to genotype. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44:577–581. doi: 10.1177/0091270004265642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wenk M, Todesco L, Krähenbühl S. Effect of St John’s wort on the activities of CYP1A2, CYP3A4, CYP2D6, N-acetyltransferase 2, and xanthine oxidase in healthy males and females. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57:495–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02049.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dresser GK, Schwarz UI, Wilkinson GR, Kim RB. Coordinate induction of both cytochrome P4503A and MDR1 by St John’s wort in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;73:41–50. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2003.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Roby CA, Dryer DA, Burstein AH. St. John’s wort: effect on CYP2D6 activity using dextromethorphan–dextrorphan ratios. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001;21:530–532. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200110000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xie R, Tan LH, Polasek EC, Hong C, Teillol-Foo M, Gordi T, Sharma A, Nickens DJ, Arakawa T, Knuth DW, Antal EJ. CYP3A and P-glycoprotein activity induction with St. John’s Wort in healthy volunteers from 6 ethnic populations. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45:352–356. doi: 10.1177/0091270004273320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hall SD, Wang Z, Huang SM, Hamman MA, Vasavada N, Adigun AQ, Hilligoss JK, Miller M, Gorski JC. The interaction between St John’s wort and an oral contraceptive. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;74:525–535. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Imai H, Kotegawa T, Tsutsumi K, Morimoto T, Eshima N, Nakano S, Ohashi K. The recovery time-course of CYP3A after induction by St John’s wort administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65:701–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03120.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang LS, Zhou G, Zhu B, Wu J, Wang JG, Abd El-Aty AM, Li T, Liu J, Yang TL, Wang D, Zhong XY, Zhou HH. St John’s wort induces both cytochrome P450 3A4-catalyzed sulfoxidation and 2C19-dependent hydroxylation of omeprazole. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75:191–197. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moore LB, Goodwin B, Jones SA, Wisely GB, Serabjit-Singh CJ, Willson TM, Collins JL, Kliewer SA. St. John’s wort induces hepatic drug metabolism through activation of the pregnane X receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:7500–7502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.130155097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou SF. Structure, function and regulation of P-glycoprotein and its clinical relevance in drug disposition. Xenobiotica. 2008;38:802–832. doi: 10.1080/00498250701867889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Perloff MD, von Moltke LL, Störmer E, Shader RI, Greenblatt DJ. Saint John’s wort: an in vitro analysis of P-glycoprotein induction due to extended exposure. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;134:1601–1608. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hennessy M, Kelleher D, Spiers JP, Barry M, Kavanagh P, Back D, Mulcahy F, Feely J. St Johns wort increases expression of P-glycoprotein: implications for drug interactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53:75–82. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01516.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Johne A, Brockmöller J, Bauer S, Maurer A, Langheinrich M, Roots I. Pharmacokinetic interaction of digoxin with an herbal extract from St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;66:338–345. doi: 10.1053/cp.1999.v66.a101944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mueller SC, Uehleke B, Woehling H, Petzsch M, Majcher-Peszynska J, Hehl EM, Sievers H, Frank B, Riethling AK, Drewelow B. Effect of St John’s wort dose and preparations on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75:546–557. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dürr D, Stieger B, Kullak-Ublick GA, Rentsch KM, Steinert HC, Meier PJ, Fattinger K. St John’s Wort induces intestinal P-glycoprotein/MDR1 and intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;68:598–604. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2000.112240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schwarz UI, Hanso H, Oertel R, Miehlke S, Kuhlisch E, Glaeser H, Hitzl M, Dresser GK, Kim RB, Kirch W. Induction of intestinal P-glycoprotein by St John’s wort reduces the oral bioavailability of talinolol. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;81:669–678. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang Z, Hamman MA, Huang SM, Lesko LJ, Hall SD. Effect of St John’s wort on the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;71:414–420. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.124080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rengelshausen J, Banfield M, Riedel KD, Burhenne J, Weiss J, Thomsen T, Walter-Sack I, Haefeli WE, Mikus G. Opposite effects of short-term and long-term St John’s wort intake on voriconazole pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005;78:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mai I, Bauer S, Perloff ES, Johne A, Uehleke B, Frank B, Budde K, Roots I. Hyperforin content determines the magnitude of the St John’s wort–cyclosporine drug interaction. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;76:330–340. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mueller SC, Majcher-Peszynska J, Uehleke B, Klammt S, Mundkowski RG, Miekisch W, Sievers H, Bauer S, Frank B, Kundt G, Drewelow B. The extent of induction of CYP3A by St. John’s wort varies among products and is linked to hyperforin dose. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62:29–36. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0061-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mueller SC, Majcher-Peszynska J, Mundkowski RG, Uehleke B, Klammt S, Sievers H, Lehnfeld R, Frank B, Thurow K, Kundt G, Drewelow B. No clinically relevant CYP3A induction after St. John’s wort with low hyperforin content in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65:81–87. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0554-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.L’homme RF, Dijkema T, van der Ven AJ, Burger DM. Brief report: enzyme inducers reduce elimination half-life after a single dose of nevirapine in healthy women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43:193–196. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000234089.41785.c8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Will-Shahab L, Bauer S, Kunter U, Roots I, Brattström A. St John’s wort extract (Ze 117) does not alter the pharmacokinetics of a low-dose oral contraceptive. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65:287–294. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0587-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhou SF, Zhou ZW, Li CG, Chen X, Yu X, Xue CC, Herington A. Identification of drugs that interact with herbs in drug development. Drug Discov Today. 2007;12:664–673. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bon S, Hartmann K, Kubn M. Johanniskraut: ein enzyminduktor? Schweitzer Apothekerzeitung. 1999;16:535–536. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Breidenbach T, Kliem V, Burg M, Radermacher J, Hoffmann MW, Klempnauer J. Profound drop of cyclosporin A whole blood trough levels caused by St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) Transplantation. 2000;69:2229–2230. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200005270-00052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Breidenbach T, Hoffmann MW, Becker T, Schlitt H, Klempnauer J. Drug interaction of St John’s wort with cyclosporin. Lancet. 2000;355:1912. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73359-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Roots I, Johne A, Mauer A, et al. Arzneimittel interaktionen von hypericum-extract. Proc Germ Soc Pharmacol. 2000; Berlin.
- 51.Rey JM, Walter G. Hypericum perforatum (St John’s wort) in depression: pest or blessing? Med J Aust. 1998;169:583–586. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb123424.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ruschitzka F, Meier PJ, Turina M, Lüscher TF, Noll G. Acute heart transplant rejection due to Saint John’s wort. Lancet. 2000;355:548–549. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05467-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Barone GW, Gurley BJ, Ketel BL, Lightfoot ML, Abul-Ezz SR. Drug interaction between St. John’s wort and cyclosporine. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:1013–1016. doi: 10.1345/aph.10088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mai I, Krüger H, Budde K, Johne A, Brockmöller J, Neumayer HH, Roots I. Hazardous pharmacokinetic interaction of Saint John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) with the immunosuppressant cyclosporin. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;38:500–502. doi: 10.5414/cpp38500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Karliova M, Treichel U, Malagò M, Frilling A, Gerken G, Broelsch CE. Interaction of Hypericum perforatum (St. John’s wort) with cyclosporin A metabolism in a patient after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2000;33:853–855. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8278(00)80321-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mandelbaum A, Pertzborn F, Martin-Facklam M, Wiesel M. Unexplained decrease of cyclosporin trough levels in a compliant renal transplant patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15:1473–1474. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.9.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Turton-Weeks SM, Barone GW, Gurley BJ, Ketel BL, Lightfoot ML, Abul-Ezz SR. St John’s wort: a hidden risk for transplant patients. Prog Transplant. 2001;11:116–120. doi: 10.1177/152692480101100207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ahmed SM, Banner NR, Dubrey SW. Low cyclosporin-A level due to Saint-John’s-wort in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:795. doi: 10.1016/S1053-2498(00)00221-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Beer AM, Ostermann T. St. John’s wort: interaction with cyclosporine increases risk of rejection for the kidney transplant and raises daily cost of medication. Med Klin (Munich) 2001;96:480–483. doi: 10.1007/PL00002231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Moschella C, Jaber BL. Interaction between cyclosporine and Hypericum perforatum (St. John’s wort) after organ transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:1105–1107. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.28617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Alscher DM, Klotz U. Drug interaction of herbal tea containing St. John’s wort with cyclosporine. Transpl Int. 2003;16:543–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2003.tb00345.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bolley R, Zülke C, Kammerl M, Fischereder M, Krämer BK. Tacrolimus-induced nephrotoxicity unmasked by induction of the CYP3A4 system with St John’s wort. Transplantation. 2002;73:1009. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200203270-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hebert MF, Park JM, Chen YL, Akhtar S, Larson AM. Effects of St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44:89–94. doi: 10.1177/0091270003261078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mai I, Störmer E, Bauer S, Krüger H, Budde K, Roots I. Impact of St John’s wort treatment on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in renal transplant patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:819–822. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Saraga M, Zullino DF. St. John’s wort, corticosteroids, cocaine, alcohol and a first manic episode. Praxis (Bern 1994) 2005;94:987–989. doi: 10.1024/0369-8394.94.23.987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bell EC, Ravis WR, Chan HM, Lin YJ. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between St. John’s wort and prednisone. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:1819–1824. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yue QY, Bergquist C, Gerdén B. Safety of St John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) Lancet. 2000;355:576–577. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73227-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Pfrunder A, Schiesser M, Gerber S, Haschke M, Bitzer J, Drewe J. Interaction of St John’s wort with low-dose oral contraceptive therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56:683–690. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.02005.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Murphy PA, Kern SE, Stanczyk FZ, Westhoff CL. Interaction of St. John’s wort with oral contraceptives: effects on the pharmacokinetics of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol, ovarian activity and breakthrough bleeding. Contraception. 2005;71:402–408. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Schwarz UI, Büschel B, Kirch W. Unwanted pregnancy on self-medication with St John’s wort despite hormonal contraception. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;55:112–113. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01716.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Skolnick JL, Stoler BS, Katz DB, Anderson WH. Rifampin, oral contraceptives, and pregnancy. JAMA. 1976;236:1382. doi: 10.1001/jama.236.12.1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lazovic G, Radivojevic U, Marinkovic J. Tibolone: the way to beat many a postmenopausal ailments. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008;9:1039–1047. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.6.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Etogo-Asse F, Boemer F, Sempoux C, Geubel A. Acute hepatitis with prolonged cholestasis and disappearance of interlobular bile ducts following tibolone and Hypericum perforatum (St. John’s wort). Case of drug interaction? Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2008;71:36–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Huang SM, Lesko LJ, Williams RL. Assessment of the quality and quantity of drug-drug interaction studies in recent NDA submissions: study design and data analysis issues. J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;39:1006–1014. doi: 10.1177/00912709922011764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.O’Reilly RA. Studies on the optical enantiomorphs of warfarin in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974;16:348–354. doi: 10.1002/cpt1974162348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jiang X, Williams KM, Liauw WS, Ammit AJ, Roufogalis BD, Duke CC, Day RO, McLachlan AJ. Effect of St John’s wort and ginseng on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57:592–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02051.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Donath F, Roots I, Langheinrich M, et al. Interaction of St John’s wort extract with phenprocoumon. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;55:A22. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sugimoto K, Ohmori M, Tsuruoka S, Nishiki K, Kawaguchi A, Harada K, Arakawa M, Sakamoto K, Masada M, Miyamori I, Fujimura A. Different effects of St John’s wort on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and pravastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;70:518–524. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.120025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Andrén L, Andreasson A, Eggertsen R. Interaction between a commercially available St. John’s wort product (Movina) and atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;63:913–916. doi: 10.1007/s00228-007-0345-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Wang XD, Li JL, Su QB, Guan S, Chen J, Du J, He YW, Zeng J, Zhang JX, Chen X, Huang M, Zhou SF. Impact of the haplotypes of the human pregnane X receptor gene on the basal and St John’s wort-induced activity of cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67:255–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03344.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Tannergren C, Engman H, Knutson L, Hedeland M, Bondesson U, Lennernäs H. St John’s wort decreases the bioavailability of R- and S-verapamil through induction of the first-pass metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;75:298–309. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Tardif JC. Ivabradine: I(f) inhibition in the management of stable angina pectoris and other cardiovascular diseases. Drugs Today (Barc) 2008;44:171–181. doi: 10.1358/dot.2008.44.3.1193864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Portolés A, Terleira A, Calvo A, Martínez I, Resplandy G. Effects of Hypericum perforatum on ivabradine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: an open-label, pharmacokinetic interaction clinical trial. J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;46:1188–1194. doi: 10.1177/0091270006291623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.van den Bout-van den Beukel CJ, Koopmans PP, van der Ven AJ, De Smet PA, Burger DM. Possible drug–metabolism interactions of medicinal herbs with antiretroviral agents. Drug Metab Rev. 2006;38:477–514. doi: 10.1080/03602530600754065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Piscitelli SC, Burstein AH, Chaitt D, Alfaro RM, Falloon J. Indinavir concentrations and St John’s wort. Lancet. 2000;355:547–548. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05712-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hu Z, Yang X, Ho PC, Chan SY, Heng PW, Chan E, Duan W, Koh HL, Zhou S. Herb–drug interactions: a literature review. Drugs. 2005;65:1239–1282. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565090-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.de Maat MM, Hoetelmans RM, Math t RA, van Gorp EC, Meenhorst PL, Mulder JW, Beijnen JH. Drug interaction between St John’s wort and nevirapine. AIDS. 2001;15:420–421. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200102160-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Erickson DA, Mather G, Trager WF, Levy RH, Keirns JJ. Characterization of the in vitro biotransformation of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine by human hepatic cytochromes P-450. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999;27:1488–1495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Meijerman I, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Herb–drug interactions in oncology: focus on mechanisms of induction. Oncologist. 2006;11:742–752. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-7-742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Mathijssen RH, Verweij J, de Bruijn P, Loos WJ, Sparreboom A. Effects of St. John’s wort on irinotecan metabolism. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1247–1249. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.16.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Frye RF, Fitzgerald SM, Lagattuta TF, Hruska MW, Egorin MJ. Effect of St John’s wort on imatinib mesylate pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;76:323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Smith P, Bullock JM, Booker BM, Haas CE, Berenson CS, Jusko WJ. The influence of St. John’s wort on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of imatinib mesylate. Pharmacotherapy. 2004;24:1508–1514. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.16.1508.50958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kales A. Quazepam: hypnotic efficacy and side effects. Pharmacotherapy. 1990;10:1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kawaguchi A, Ohmori M, Tsuruoka S, Nishiki K, Harada K, Miyamori I, Yano R, Nakamura T, Masada M, Fujimura A. Drug interaction between St John’s wort and quazepam. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58:403–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02171.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Dannawi M. Possible serotonin syndrome after combination of buspirone and St John’s wort. J Psychopharmacol. 2002;16:401. doi: 10.1177/026988110201600420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Spinella M, Eaton LA. Hypomania induced by herbal and pharmaceutical psychotropic medicines following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2002;16:359–367. doi: 10.1080/02699050110103319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lantz MS, Buchalter E, Giambanco V. St. John’s wort and antidepressant drug interactions in the elderly. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1999;12:7–10. doi: 10.1177/089198879901200103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Gordon JB. SSRIs and St John’s wort: possible toxicity? Am Fam Phys. 1998;57:950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Prost N, Tichadou L, Rodor F, Nguyen N, David JM, Jean-Pastor MJ. St. Johns wort–venlafaxine interaction. Presse Med. 2000;29:1285–1286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Barbenel DM, Yusufi B, O’Shea D, Bench CJ. Mania in a patient receiving testosterone replacement postorchidectomy taking St John’s wort and sertraline. J Psychopharmacol. 2000;14:84–86. doi: 10.1177/026988110001400113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Fugh-Berman A, Ernst E. Herb–drug interactions: review and assessment of report reliability. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:587–595. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01469.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Johne A, Schmider J, Brockmöller J, Stadelmann AM, Störmer E, Bauer S, Scholler G, Langheinrich M, Roots I. Decreased plasma levels of amitriptyline and its metabolites on comedication with an extract from St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002;22:46–54. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200202000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Burstein AH, Horton RL, Dunn T, Alfaro RM, Piscitelli SC, Theodore W. Lack of effect of St John’s wort on carbamazepine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000;68:605–612. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2000.111530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kerr BM, Thummel KE, Wurden CJ, Klein SM, Kroetz DL, Gonzalez FJ, Levy RH. Human liver carbamazepine metabolism. Role of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 in 10,11-epoxide formation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994;47:1969–1979. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(94)90071-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Johne A, Perloff ES, Bauer S, Schmider J, Mai I, Brockmöller J, Roots I. Impact of cytochrome P-450 inhibition by cimetidine and induction by carbamazepine on the kinetics of hypericin and pseudohypericin in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;60:617–622. doi: 10.1007/s00228-004-0823-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ang-Lee MK, Moss J, Yuan CS. Herbal medicines and perioperative care. JAMA. 2001;286:208–216. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.2.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Crowe S, McKeating K. Delayed emergence and St. John’s wort. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1025–1027. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Irefin S, Sprung J. A possible cause of cardiovascular collapse during anesthesia: long-term use of St. John’s wort. J Clin Anesth. 2000;12:498–499. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(00)00199-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Eich-Höchli D, Oppliger R, Golay KP, Baumann P, Eap CB. Methadone maintenance treatment and St. John’s wort—a case report. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2003;36:35–37. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Wilkes S. The use of bupropion SR in cigarette smoking cessation. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3:45–53. doi: 10.2147/copd.s1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Milton JC, Abdulla A. Prolonged oro-facial dystonia in a 58 year old female following therapy with bupropion and St John’s wort. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64:717–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02962.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Bryant SM, Kolodchak J. Serotonin syndrome resulting from an herbal detox cocktail. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22:625–626. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Hansel TT, Tennant RC, Tan AJ, Higgins LA, Neighbour H, Erin EM, Barnes PJ. Theophylline: mechanism of action and use in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drugs Today (Barc) 2004;40:55–69. doi: 10.1358/dot.2004.40.1.799438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Nebel A, Schneider BJ, Baker RK, Kroll DJ. Potential metabolic interaction between St. John’s wort and theophylline. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33:502. doi: 10.1345/aph.18252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Morimoto T, Kotegawa T, Tsutsumi K, Ohtani Y, Imai H, Nakano S. Effect of St. John’s wort on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44:95–101. doi: 10.1177/0091270003261496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Xu H, Williams KM, Liauw WS, Murray M, Day RO, McLachlan AJ. Effects of St John’s wort and CYP2C9 genotype on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of gliclazide. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:1579–1586. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Brüggemann RJ, Donnelly JP, Aarnoutse RE, Warris A, Blijlevens NM, Mouton JW, Verweij PE, Burger DM. Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole. Ther Drug Monit. 2008;30:403–411. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181898b0c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Sandrini G, Perrotta A, Nappi G. Eletriptan: a review and new perspectives. Expert Rev Neurother. 2006;6:1413–1421. doi: 10.1586/14737175.6.10.1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Bonetto N, Santelli L, Battistin L, Cagnin A. Serotonin syndrome and rhabdomyolysis induced by concomitant use of triptans, fluoxetine and hypericum. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:1421–1423. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01430.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Shi S, Klotz U. Proton pump inhibitors: an update of their clinical use and pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64:935–951. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0538-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Baker DE. Loperamide: a pharmacological review. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2007;7:S11–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Khawaja IS, Marotta RF, Lippmann S. Herbal medicines as a factor in delirium. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:969–970. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.7.969a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
