Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 10;17(10):1357–1366. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9241-9

Table 1.

IWQOL-Lite quality of life scores of four populations: unadjusted weighted means and estimated weighted means after adjustment for BMI, age, and gender

PF SE SL PD WO TT
Unadjusted weighted means
General 77 81 91 88 92 83
Non-treatment 47† 41‡ 61† 62* 65* 52†
Conservative treatment 58‡ 56‡ 61‡ 64‡ 64‡ 59‡
Surgical treatment 28‡ 34‡ 43‡ 38‡ 49‡ 36‡
BMI §
General 48 59 60 47 63 54
Non-treatment 59 49 73 78* 79 64
Conservative treatment 52 52 56 56 58 54
Surgical treatment 59 55 74 80* 81 66
Age ∥
General 78 81 94 94 96 85
Non-treatment 45† 40‡ 53‡ 49† 53† 46†
Conservative treatment 58‡ 56‡ 60‡ 61‡ 61‡ 58‡
Surgical treatment 28‡ 34‡ 43‡ 38‡ 49‡ 35‡
Gender ¶
General 78 81 92 90 91 84
Non-treatment 47† 40‡ 62‡ 63† 68† 53‡
Conservative treatment 66* 59‡ 73‡ 80* 81† 69‡
Surgical treatment 28‡ 33‡ 43‡ 38‡ 49‡ 36‡

PF: Physical function, SE: Self-esteem, SL: Sexual life, PD: Public distress, WO: Work, TT: Total (the higher scores reflect a better quality of life).

* P<.05, †P<.01, ‡P<.001, these P-values refer to the significance of the difference between the quality of life score of the specific population as compared to the quality of life of all other populations.

§ Estimated weighted means after adjustment for BMI.

∥ Estimated weighted means after adjustment for age.

¶ Estimated weighted means after adjustment for gender.