Table 3.
Subject A (dose 8×1010 vg/kg) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time Point | IgG11 | IgG21 | IgG31 | IgG41 | IgM1 | Neutralizing Titer2,3 |
Baseline | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 253 | ND |
Day 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 269 | ND |
Day 7 | 20697 | 433 | 874 | 197 | 1319 | 1:316 – 1:3.1×103 |
Week 3 | 25698 | 1548 | 0 | 312 | 1412 | 1:103 – 1:104 |
Week 6 | 28864 | 1073 | 429 | 212 | 1716 | 1:103 – 1:104 |
Week 16 | 29910 | 1366 | 843 | 337 | 1972 | 1:316 – 1:1000 |
Subject B (dose 8×1010 vg/kg) | ||||||
Time Point | IgG11 | IgG21 | IgG31 | IgG41 | IgM1 | Neutralizing Titer2,3 |
Baseline | 0 | 0 | 0 | 162 | 0 | 1:2 |
Day 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ND |
Day 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 1:10 – 1:31 |
Week 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1:10 – 1:31 |
Week 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ND |
Week 8 | 9916 | 1904 | 0 | 0 | 343 | ND |
Subject D (dose 4×1011 vg/kg) | ||||||
Time Point | IgG11 | IgG21 | IgG31 | IgG41 | IgM1 | Neutralizing Titer2,3 |
Baseline | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 228 | 1:11 |
Week 1 | 0 | 0 | 108 | 95 | 414 | <1:100 |
Week 2 | 0 | 510 | 0 | 299 | 795 | 1:100 – 1:316 |
Week 3 | 6950 | 672 | 0 | 8 | 1346 | 1:3.1×103 – 1:105 |
Week 5 | 27289 | 481 | 1227 | 45 | 819 | 1:3.1×103 – 1:105 |
Week 12 | 35274 | 1078 | 3507 | 54 | 956 | ND |
Subject F (dose 2×1012 vg/kg) | ||||||
Time Point | IgG11 | IgG21 | IgG31 | IgG41 | IgM1 | Neutralizing Titer2,3 |
Baseline | 4096 | 0 | 674 | 56 | 228 | 1:17 |
Week 5 | 5083 | 0 | 1284 | 1 | 468 | 1:3.1×104 –1:106 |
Week 6 | 5404 | 0 | 1492 | 82 | 535 | ND |
Week 7 | 4605 | 0 | 1485 | 0 | 269 | ND |
Week 8 | 5285 | 0 | 1433 | 0 | 401 | ND |
Week 16 | 5538 | 453 | 1963 | 0 | 415 | ND |
Values shown represent antibody concentrations in ng/mL.
Neutralizing titer represents the highest dilution at which greater than or equal to 50% transduction occurs compared to controls.
These data were previously published [Manno et al., 2006] and are added here for comparison.