Table 3.
Pop | Location | r | FIS | HE | HO | HW-P | NeIAM (NeSMM) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia | Parramatta Park, Cairns, Queensland | 3.75 | −0.005 | 0.5534 | 0.5563 | 0.9804 | 95989 (153786) |
Townsville, Queensland | 3.62 | 0.003 | 0.4707 | 0.4679 | 0.2988 | 58785 (76122) | |
Charters Towers, Queensland | 4.11 | −0.016 | 0.5402 | 0.5489 | 0.1127 | 77382 (112087) | |
Ingham, Queensland | 3.48 | 0.001 | 0.4422 | 0.4417 | 0.2826 | 52195 (64749) | |
Machans Beach, Cairns, Queensland | 3.70 | 0.009 | 0.5375 | 0.5326 | 0.1712 | 85160 (128822) | |
Innisfail, Queensland | 3.92 | 0.034 | 0.5237 | 0.5062 | 0.9754 | 75352 (107883) | |
Chillagoe, Queensland | 3.01 | −0.075 | 0.4214 | 0.4526 | 0.5083 | 45051 (53229) | |
Tully, Queensland | 3.66 | 0.062 | 0.5307 | 0.4980 | 0.0097 | 80992 (119731) | |
Gordonvale, Queensland | 3.42 | −0.053 | 0.4979 | 0.5238 | 0.3670 | 68679 (94546) | |
Mareeba, Queensland | 3.46 | −0.033 | 0.4503 | 0.4652 | 0.9999 | 54361 (68407) | |
Cardwell, Queensland | 3.59 | −0.021 | 0.4699 | 0.4795 | 0.2135 | 58062 (74839) | |
Mossman, Queensland | 3.50 | 0.078 | 0.4681 | 0.4321 | 0.3378 | 57973 (74682) | |
Thailand | Plaeng Yao District, Chachoengsao Province | 4.09 | 0.044 | 0.5756 | 0.5507 | 0.3745 | 81848 (121573) |
Vietnam | Cat Hai, Hai Phong, Northern | 4.53 | 0.164* | 0.5488 | 0.4606 | 0.0004* | 83457 (125072) |
Kim Bang, Ha Nam, Northern | 4.87 | 0.114 | 0.5785 | 0.5141 | 0.0259 | 84667 (127731) | |
Tri Nguyen, Khanh Hoa, Central | 4.33 | 0.045 | 0.5366 | 0.5125 | 0.0187 | 74929 (107016) | |
Buon Me Thuat, Dak Lak, Highland | 4.41 | 0.096 | 0.5308 | 0.4803 | 0.3876 | 76729 (110727) | |
Thanh Phu Dong, Ben Tre, Southern | 5.06 | 0.036 | 0.5758 | 0.5553 | 0.8587 | 102077 (168672) | |
Thanh Thoi, Vinh Long, Southern | 4.81 | 0.023 | 0.5884 | 0.5754 | 0.8783 | 97966 (158552) |
Mean values over loci are indicated for allelic richness (r), inbreeding (FIS), expected (HE) and observed (HO) heterozygosities, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium P values. Indirect estimates of Ne were calculated under the assumptions of an IAM and SMM by using a mutation rate of 6.3 × 10−6 (Shug et al. 1997).
Asterisk denotes significantly different from zero after corrections for multiple comparisons at the table-wide α = 0.05 level.