Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2009 May 28;40(8):2945–2948. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.192535
Reviewer Employment Research Grant Other Research Support Speakers' Bureau/Honoraria Expert Witness Ownership Interest Consultant/Advisory Board Other
Colin Derdeyn Washington University None Genentech* None Genentech* nFocus* WL Gore & Associates None
Philip Gorelick University of Illinois None None Boehringer-Ingelheim None None Genentech* None
Pooja Khatri University of Cincinnati NIH K23 None None None None None None
Tanya Turan Medical University of South Carolina NIH/NINDS for SAMMPRIS, Director of Risk Factor Management AAN Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship None Expert witness in medical malpractice stroke cases* inme inme inme
This table represents the relationships of reviewers that may be perceived as actual or reasonably perceived conflicts of interest as reported on the Disclosure Questionnaire, which all reviewers are required to complete and submit. A relationship is considered to be “significant” if (1) the person receives $10 000 or more during any 12-month period, or 5% or more of the person's gross income; or (2) the person owns 5% or more of the voting stock or share of the entity, or owns $10 000 or more of the fair market value of the entity. A relationship is considered to be “modest” if it is less than “significant” under the preceding definition.
* Modest.
Significant.