Table 5.

Effects of Type of Partnership on Sexual Behaviors Within Last Two Partnerships (Men)

	Usually Use Condom (Logistic Regression)						Frequent Sex (Logistic regression)						Had Other Partners (Logistic Regression)						Suspected Partner (Logistic Regression)
	Model 1 (n = 525)		Model 2 (n = 525)		Model 3 (n = 497)		Model 1 (n = 511)		Model 2 (n = 511)		Model 3 (n = 483)		Model 1 (n = 531)		Model 2 (n = 531)		Model 3 (n = 503)		Model 1 (n = 416)		Model 2 (n = 416)		Model 3 (n = 399)
Dependent Variable	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.	OR	Sig.
Type of partnership
Fiancé(e) (ref)	1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00		1.00
Spouse	0.08	***	0.05	***	0.08	***	9.41	***	10.97	***	7.25	***	0.44	*	0.39	*	0.33	*	0.93		0.80		0.68
Steady	0.68		0.79		0.88		2.19	*	2.08		1.75		0.70		0.73		0.68		2.93	*	3.11	*	3.30	*
Casual	0.57		0.66		0.71		1.98		1.87		1.98		0.58		0.61		0.56		4.46	**	4.81	**	5.55	**
Age			1.24	***	1.20	**			0.93		0.93				1.05		1.06				1.07		1.08
Educational attainment
Primary school or less (ref)					1.00						1.00						1.00						1.00
Some secondary					1.64						0.88						0.92						0.72
Currently in school					0.87						0.68						1.01						0.81
Wealth index
Poor (ref)					1.00						1.00						1.00						1.00
Middle					1.57						0.89						0.86						1.08
Rich					1.22						1.05						0.69						0.90
Region
South (ref)					1.00						1.00						1.00						1.00
Central					0.83						0.64						0.90						0.78
North					1.10						0.32	***					1.13						1.54

Note: All regressions are limited to male respondents who report having ever had sex. Because each respondent was permitted to report up to two sexual partners, we control for clustering by respondent.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^***p < .001.