Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2008 Jan–Feb;15(1):24–36. doi: 10.1080/09286580701772037

Table 4.

Summary statistics for variables measured at the eligibility examination, by enrollment status

Characteristic Participants (n=221) Non-Participants (n=10)

Mean (std) Age (years) 11.8 (2.3) 12.8 (2.5)

Mean (std) CISS score 29.9 (8.9) 25.9 (6.8)

Mean (std) Near Point of Convergence (cm) 14.3 (7.6) 11.0 (4.9)

Mean (std) Positive Fusional Vergence Break (Δ) 12.6 (4.7) 12.0 (1.7)
Mean (std) Negative Fusional Vergence Break (Δ) 14.2 (5.2) 15.3 (4.4)

Mean (std) Monocular Accommodative Amplitude (cm) 11.6 (4.2) 10.0 (3.1)
% with Accommodative Insufficiency* 55% 50%

Mean (std) Monocular Accommodative Facility (cpm) 6.9 (5.2) 8.3 (3.9)

Mean (std) Near Phoria (Δ) 9.3 exo (4.4) 9.3 exo (4.2)

Mean (std) Distance Phoria (Δ) 1.9 exo (2.8) 2.1 exo (2.3)

Mean (std) Spherical Equivalent - Right Eye (D) −0.09 (1.46) −0.38 (1.38)

Gender: % Female 60% 40%

Race

 % American Indian / Alaskan Native 5% 0%

 % Asian / Pacific Islander 2% 20%

 % Black or African American 29% 40%

 % White 53% 40%

 % Other 11% 0%

Ethnicity

 % Hispanic or Latino 34% 30%

 % Not Hispanic or Latino 64% 70%

 % Missing 2% 0%

Attention Deficit Attention Disorder

 % Yes 15% 0%

 % No 80% 70%

 % Missing 5% 30%
*

Defined as participant’s accommodative amplitude less than Hoffstetter’s minimum (15–1/4 age) accommodative amplitude criteria minus 2.0 D

Δ

= prism diopters

cpm = cycles per minute

cm = centimeters

D = Diopters

Std = standard deviation