Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 31;32(12):2218–2224. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0823

Table 2.

Clinical and lifestyle characteristics of individuals with diabetes by household food security status

Food secure* Food insecure*
At what age was diabetes first diagnosed?
    ≤39 years 18.2 (16.6–19.7) 36.0 (29.5–42.5)§
    ≥40 years 81.0 (79.4–82.6) 63.5 (57.0–70.0)§
Do you have a regular medical doctor?
    Yes 96.4 (95.8–97.1) 93.5 (90.9–96.1)
    No 3.6 (2.9–4.2) 6.5 (3.9–9.1)
Self-perceived unmet health care needs
    Yes 9.7 (8.6–10.9) 25.2 (19.4–30.9)§
    No 90.1 (88.9–91.3) 74.7 (68.9–80.5)§
Overnight patient during past 12 months
    Yes 13.7 (12.5–14.9) 27.6 (21.6–33.6)§
    No 86.3 (85.1–87.4) 71.7 (65.7–77.7)§
Length of overnight stay (nights)
    Mean (nights) 15.5 (12.3–18.8) 9.0 (6.6–11.4)§
Currently takes insulin
    Yes 19.7 (18.1–21.3) 24.8 (19.4–30.2)
    No 80.2 (78.6–81.8) 74.9 (69.6–80.3)
Takes pills to control blood glucose
    Yes 68.8 (66.9–70.6) 65.9 (59.8–71.9)
    No 31.1 (29.3–32.9) 33.9 (27.9–40.0)
Heart disease
    Yes 20.2 (18.6–21.8) 20.9 (16.3–25.6)
    No 79.4 (77.8–81.0) 78.5 (73.8–83.2)
High blood pressure
    Yes 52.3 (50.3–54.3) 46.5 (40.2–52.8)
    No 47.5 (45.4–49.5) 52.8 (46.4–59.2)
Glaucoma (aged ≥18 years)
    Yes 5.3 (4.5–6.2) 6.1 (3.3–8.9)
    No 94.5 (93.7–95.4) 93.8 (91.1–96.6)
Stroke
    Yes 4.9 (4.1–5.7) 11.2 (6.7–15.6)§
    No 95.0 (94.1–95.8) 88.3 (83.8–92.7)§
Mood disorder
    Yes 7.5 (6.6–8.4) 21.1 (17.1–25.1)§
    No 92.5 (91.6–93.4) 78.6 (74.6–82.6)§
Daily servings of fruits and vegetables
    <5 times/servings per day 49.3 (46.7–51.9) 63.9 (55.7–72.1)
    ≥5 times/servings per day 43.5 (40.8–46.1) 25.6 (19.2–32.0)
Smoking status
    Current (includes daily and occasional) 16.1 (14.7–17.5) 32.1 (26.3–38.0)§
    Former 53.5 (51.5–55.4) 38.9 (32.8–45.0)§
    Never 30.3 (28.6–32.1) 28.8 (22.4–35.3)
Physical activity index
    Inactive 56.9 (54.9–58.9) 63.7 (57.6–69.8)
    Moderate to active 38.7 (36.8–40.7) 29.2 (23.8–34.7)§
BMI: self-reported
    Obese 35.0 (33.2–36.9) 40.3 (34.4–46.3)
    Overweight 36.2 (34.4–38.1) 29.8 (23.6–36.0)
    Neither overweight nor obese 26.4 (24.7–28.0) 22.4 (17.1–27.7)
Average daily alcohol consumption
    ≥1 drink 27.2 (24.9–29.5) 14.8 (9.0–20.7)§
    Never 70.7 (68.3–73.0) 84.7 (78.9–90.5)
Satisfaction with life in general
    Negative(dissatisfied, very dissatisfied) 4.5 (3.7–5.3) 20.5 (16.0–25.0)§
    Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 5.8 (4.9–6.6) 14.5 (10.8–18.2)§
    Positive (very satisfied, satisfied) 85.0 (83.6–86.4) 57.8 (51.7–63.9)§
Self-perceived health
    Poor to fair 36.4 (34.6–38.2) 61.6 (55.5–67.7)§
    Good 41.8 (39.9–43.8) 28.9 (23.3–34.5)§
    Very good to excellent 21.5 (19.8–23.3) 9.5 (5.3–13.6)§
Self-perceived mental health
    Poor to fair (“poor,” “fair”) 6.1 (5.3–7.0) 23.6 (18.2–29.0)§
    Good 23.7 (22.0–25.4) 31.0 (25.5–36.5)§
    Very good 32.5 (30.8–34.3) 25.2 (19.1–31.3)
    Excellent 33.2 (31.3–35.0) 13.2 (9.6–16.8)§
Self-perceived stress (aged ≥15 years)
    Quite a bit or extremely stressful 18.3 (16.8–19.9) 40.3 (34.0–46.5)§
    A bit stressful 37.0 (35.1–38.8) 30.4 (24.9–35.9)
    Not at all or not very stressful 44.2 (42.2–46.2) 28.3 (22.2–34.3)§

Data are proportions (95% CI). These analyses are based on data from individuals with diabetes, aged ≥12 years, living in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut provinces that incorporated the food security module in their survey.

*Survey expansion weights were used with the CCHS 3.1 data to produce proportion estimates and population numbers representative at the population level. In this table, the proportions apply to the weighted population number reported at the top of the column.

†Weighted total food-secure population, n = 1,006,700.

‡Weighted total food-insecure population, n = 103,200.

§Estimates for food-insecure individuals with diabetes versus food-secure individuals with diabetes are significantly different, based on nonoverlapping 95% CIs.

∥This estimate is considered to be of marginal quality because of the high sampling variability associated with it.

¶This variable was only available for respondents residing in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Prince Edward Island and is representative of a weighted population of ∼674,100 individuals living in food-secure households and ∼69,400 living in food-insecure households in these combined provinces.