Table 4.
Statistical analysis of positives by scoring functions in MOULDER set.
| True Positives | False Positives | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination of scores | #decoys | Combination of scores | #decoys |
| Prosa2003 | 34 | DFIRE; DOPE | 126 |
 ; ZEmin; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE
|
23 | Prosa2003; DFIRE; DOPE | 81 |
|
Prosa2003; ; DFIRE; DOPE; |
19 | Prosa2003 | 72 |
|
Prosa2003; ; ZEmin; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE
|
14 | ZEmin | 48 |
| Prosa2003; DFIRE; DOPE | 12 |
Prosa2003; ; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE
|
35 |
| Prosa2003; DFIRE | 10 |
; ZEmin; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE
|
34 |
| ZEmin | 9 | DFIRE | 33 |
|
Prosa2003;
|
8 |
; DFIRE; DOPE
|
31 |
| DFIRE; DOPE | 3 | DOPE | 31 |
| Prosa2003; ZEmin | 2 | |
24 |
|
; ZEmin; DFIRE; DOPE
|
2 |
; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE
|
18 |
| Prosa2003; ZEmin; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE | 2 | ZEmin; DFIRE; DOPE | 17 |
| ZEmin; GA341 | 2 |
Prosa2003; ; DFIRE; DOPE
|
16 |
| Prosa2003; ZEmin; GA341 | 1 |
; ZEmin; DFIRE; DOPE
|
15 |
| ZEmin; DFIRE; DOPE | 1 | GA341 | 13 |
|
1 | Prosa2003; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE | 13 |
|
; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE
|
1 |
; ZEmin
|
10 |
|
; ZEmin; GA341
|
1 | ZEmin; DFIRE | 7 |
|
Prosa2003; ; DOPE
|
1 |
Prosa2003;
|
6 |
| ZEmin; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE | 1 | DFIRE; GA341; DOPE | 5 |
| GA341 | 1 |
Prosa2003; ; GA341
|
3 |
|
Prosa2003; ; ZEmin; DFIRE; DOPE
|
1 |
; ZEmin; DFIRE
|
3 |
|
; DFIRE; DOPE
|
1 |
Prosa2003; ; ZEmin; DFIRE; GA341; DOPE
|
3 |
| Prosa2003; DOPE | 3 | ||
| ZEmin; DOPE | 3 | ||
| Prosa2003; DFIRE; | 3 | ||
|
; ZEmin; DFIRE; GA341
|
3 | ||
|
; DOPE
|
3 | ||
| ZEmin; GA341 | 3 | ||
|
; GA341
|
1 | ||
|
; DFIRE
|
1 | ||
|
; ZEmin; GA341
|
1 | ||
Distribution of true-positives and false-positives among decoys of MOULDER according to one or more scoring functions and their thresholds. Columns show the number of decoys (#decoys) found by one or more scoring functions (combination of scores).