Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hypertension. 2009 Nov 2;54(6):1313–1320. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.140038

Table 2.

Effects of Spironolactone on Left Ventricular Functional Measurements After PNx or Infusion of MBG

Group Sham (n=12) S (n=10) PNx (n=12) PNx+S (n=8) MBG (n=10) MBG+S (n=8)
EDV, μL 193±15 197±22 129±9 200±15§ 147±11* 207±181
ESV, μL 95±9 97±5 39±7 85±10§ 57±6 99±12
SV, μL 115±8 120±16 106±10 109±9 98±9 108±11
EF, % 57±2 55±3 76±3 54±8§ 64±3* 60±4
Tau, ms 11.9±0.7 10.6±0.9 17.6±2.0* 13.3±1.2 12.8±0.9 9.9±1.4
EDPVR, mm Hg/μL 0.031±0.004 0.031±0.001 0.046±0.006* 0.027±0.005 0.042±0.004* 0.031±0.005

S indicates spironolactone; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESR, end-systolic volume; SV, stroke volume; EF, ejection fraction; Tau, time constant for isovolumic relaxation; EDPVR, slope of the regression line fit to the end-diastolic pressure and volume data generated by inferior vena caval constriction.

*

P<0.05 vs sham.

P<0.01 vs sham.

P<0.05 vs PNx.

§

P<0.01 vs PNx.

P<0.05 vs MBG.

P<0.01 vs MBG.