Table 2.
Effects of Spironolactone on Left Ventricular Functional Measurements After PNx or Infusion of MBG
Group | Sham (n=12) | S (n=10) | PNx (n=12) | PNx+S (n=8) | MBG (n=10) | MBG+S (n=8) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV, μL | 193±15 | 197±22 | 129±9† | 200±15§ | 147±11* | 207±181¶ |
ESV, μL | 95±9 | 97±5 | 39±7† | 85±10§ | 57±6† | 99±12∥ |
SV, μL | 115±8 | 120±16 | 106±10 | 109±9 | 98±9 | 108±11 |
EF, % | 57±2 | 55±3 | 76±3† | 54±8†§ | 64±3* | 60±4 |
Tau, ms | 11.9±0.7 | 10.6±0.9 | 17.6±2.0* | 13.3±1.2‡ | 12.8±0.9 | 9.9±1.4 |
EDPVR, mm Hg/μL | 0.031±0.004 | 0.031±0.001 | 0.046±0.006* | 0.027±0.005‡ | 0.042±0.004* | 0.031±0.005∥ |
S indicates spironolactone; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESR, end-systolic volume; SV, stroke volume; EF, ejection fraction; Tau, time constant for isovolumic relaxation; EDPVR, slope of the regression line fit to the end-diastolic pressure and volume data generated by inferior vena caval constriction.
P<0.05 vs sham.
P<0.01 vs sham.
P<0.05 vs PNx.
P<0.01 vs PNx.
P<0.05 vs MBG.
P<0.01 vs MBG.