Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2009 Aug 28;89(5):331–333. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.07.007

Table 1.

Characteristics of antibacterial assays for detecting new leads.

Goldman and Laughon: Discovery and Validation of New Antitubercular Compounds as Potential Drug Leads and Probes

Assay Advantages Disadvantages
Whole cell growth inhibition Compound likely enters
microbial cells: the cell entry
problem is less of an issue

Can immediately move to:
whole cell mode of action
analysis, evaluation of
microbial spectrum
Usually a longer assay (many
hours to days)

Nonspecific compounds
acting at the cell surface or
intracellularly may be detected

Compound could be unstable,
sequestered or degraded by
cells and thus inactive but
analog could be a valid lead

Mode of action unknown; may
need to determine/validate for
further development and to
avoid optimizing nonspecific
action or target drift

Isolated in vitro enzyme or
pathway
Usually a rapid assay
(minutes as opposed to hours
or days)

Target known in advance
Nonspecific compounds may
be detected

Compound may not enter
cells, or could be sequestered
or degraded

If compound is active on
whole cells, the mode of
action needs to be confirmed

Hybrid whole cell with specific
enzyme or pathway targeted
readout
Compound likely enters
microbial cells: the cell entry
problem is less of an issue

Can immediately move to:
whole cell mode of action
analysis; evaluation of
microbial spectrum

Target known in advance
Usually a longer assay (many
hours to days)

More difficult to design

The mode of action needs to
be confirmed to support
further development and to
avoid optimizing nonspecific
action or target drift

Unknown interactions can
give false positives that are
difficult to unravel

Compound could be unstable,
sequestered or degraded by
cells and thus inactive but
analog could be a valid lead