Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comb Chem. 2009 Nov-Dec;11(6):1083–1093. doi: 10.1021/cc900109e

Table 3.

Characterization of the Representative Compounds 5{R1,R2,R3} of Scheme 3

Entry Compound Yielda Purityb MW(found)c
1 5{6,1,3} 84% 99% 1043
2 5{5,2,3} 95% 99% 1039
3 5{7,2,3} 90% 99% 1057
4 5{5,1,1} 78% 97% 952
5 5{7,1,1} 91% 99% 970
6 5{5,2,1} 95% 98% 982
7 5{6,2,1} 98% 97% 1017
8 5{7,2,1} 99% 97% 1000
9 5{5,1,2} 84% 99% 1042
10 5{5,2,2} 99% 98% 1072
11 5{6,2,2} 96% 96% 1107
12 5{7,2,2} 96% 92% 1090
13 5{5,1,3} 77% 96% 1008
14 5{7,1,3} 98% 99% 1027
15 5{6,2,3} 92% 89% 1072
16 5{6,1,1} 97% 98% 987
17 5{6,1,2} 100% 91% 1077
18 5{7,1,2} 96% 96% 1060
a

The yield (%) was calculated by the weight of the solid obtained after F-SPE.

b

The purity (%) was based on the integration area of HPLC peaks detected at 214 nm.

c

MW (found) was determined by HPLC/ESI MS. Compounds in lines 13–18 were not used in the nitro reductions/cyclizations.