Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comb Chem. 2009 Nov-Dec;11(6):1083–1093. doi: 10.1021/cc900109e

Table 4.

Characterization of the Representative Compounds 6{R1,R2,R3} of Scheme 3

Entry Compound Yielda Purityb MW(found)c
1 6{6,1,3} 83% 69% 980
2 6{5,2,3} 91% 89% 976
3 6{7,2,3} 89% 83% 994
4 6{5,1,1} 76% 92% 890
5 6{7,1,1} 91% 82% 908
6 6{5,2,1} 84% 67% 920
7 6{6,2,1} 53% 67% 954
8 6{7,2,1} 66% 68% 938
9 6{5,1,2} 74% 28% 980
10 6{5,2,2} 86% 98% 1010
11 6{6,2,2} 95% 93% 1044
12 6{7,2,2} 93% 62% 1028
13 6{5,1,3} 91% 88% 946
14 6{7,1,3} 79% 87% 964
15 6{6,2,3} 78% 84% 1010
16 6{6,1,1} 84% 82% 924
17 6{6,1,2} 86% 92% 1014
18 6{7,1,2} 91% 83% 998
a

The yield (%) was calculated by the weight of the solid obtained after F-SPE.

b

The purity (%) was based on the integration area of HPLC peaks detected at 214 nm.

c

MW (found) was determined by HPLC/ESI MS. Compounds in lines 13–18 were not used in the Suzuki coupling reactions.