Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jul 15;50(11):5137–5147. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3799

Table 3.

Predictions and Outcomes for I-Ped Detection Rate Analyses (12 HH and 12 NV)

	Primary Prediction			Secondary Predictions
	Prediction	Outcome	Statistics^*	Prediction	Outcome	Statistics^*
A_L	LHH < NV	LHH < NV^†	z = 4.90, P < 0.001	LHH < RHH	LHH < RHH^†	z = 2.45, P = 0.007
				RHH = NV	RHH < NV	z = 2.56, P = 0.005
A_R	LHH < NV	LHH = NV	z = 1.21, P = 0.113	LHH < RHH	LHH = RHH	z = 0.43, P = 0.332
				RHH = NV	RHH = NV^†	z = 0.69, P = 0.245
B_L	RHH = NV	RHH ≈ NV^†	z = 1.50, P = 0.067	LHH = NV	LHH = NV^†	z = 0.00, P = 1.00
C_L	LHH < NV	LHH < NV^†	z = 1.88, P = 0.030	RHH < NV	RHH < NV^†	z = 2.85, P = 0.002
D_R	RHH < NV	RHH < NV^†	z = 4.59, P < 0.001	RHH < LHH	RHH < LHH^†	z = 3.69, P < 0.001
				LHH = NV	LHH = NV^†	z = 0.34, P = 0.367

For significant results the probability is in bold type.

^*

For each I-Ped, there was 1 presentation per participant per session (total of 24 for NV, 12 for LHH, and 12 for RHH across both sessions).

^†

Outcomes that agree with predictions.