Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Inform. 2009 Jun 16;42(6):990–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.05.010

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

A barplot of the proportion of belief criteria strategies at four different stringency levels that matched the accuracy but had better coverage than the most stringent strategy. Figure 4 explains the numerical metric for stringency that is used in this plot. The plot makes it clear that less stringent strategies often result in a greater coverage of known interactions with no loss of accuracy.