Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Res. 2009 Sep 29;1303:111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.091

Table 1.

Participant characteristics. Number of male and female participants and mean (standard error) age, Stanford-Binet quantitative skills score, birth weight and gestational age across reading and birth groups. Significant differences between groups are indicated.

Male:Female Poor Average Good All Reading
Full-Term 3:2 4:0 0:2 7:4
Low Risk 1:3 1:1 3:1 5:5
High Risk 3:0 1:3 1:2 5:5
All Birth Groups 7:5 6:4 4:5 17:14

Age Poor Average Good All Reading
Full-term 16.3 (.17) 16.6 (.29) 16.9 (.21) 16.6 (.14)
Low Risk 16.3 (.30) 17.0 (.04) 16.2 (.25) 16.4 (.17)
High Risk 15.6 (.32) 16.8 (.19) 15.9 (.36) 16.2 (.22)
All Birth Groups 16.1 (.16) 16.8 (.13) 16.3 (.20) 16.4 (.11)

Quantitative skills Poor Average Good All Reading
Full-term 97.1 (2.8) 98.8 (1.0) 100.6 (5.1) 98.3 (1.5)
Low Risk 90.6 (2.0) 98.3 (8.7) 98.5 (.7) 95.3 (2.0)
High Risk 89.9 (4.4) 96.1 (5.9) 106.7 (5.4) 97.4 (3.6)
All Birth Groups 93.1 (1.9) 97.6 (2.6) 101.7 (2.2)* 97.1 (1.4)

Birth Weight Poor Average Good All Reading
Full-term 3362 (139) 3607 (251) 3582 (158) 3491 (110)
Low Risk 1265 (96) 1185 (175) 1408 (43) 1306 (55)**
High Risk 825 (208) 929 (17) 960 (187) 907 (75)**,***
All Birth Groups 2028 (352) 2051 (435) 1742 (360) 1952 (216)

Gestational Age Poor Average Good All Reading
Full-term 40.0 (0.0) 40.0 (0.0) 40.0 (0.0) 40.0 (0.0)
Low Risk 30.5 (1.2) 30.5 (1.5) 32.3 (1.0) 31.2 (0.7)**
High Risk 27.0 (1.7) 28.5 (0.6) 28.0 (1.0) 29.7 (1.2)** ,***
All Birth Groups 34.5 (1.5) 34.1 (1.9) 32.6 (1.6) 33.3 (1.0)
*

Significantly different (p<=0.01) than poor readers;

**

Significantly different (p<0.001) than full-term;

***

Significantly difference (p<0.01) than low-risk