Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Infant Behav Dev. 2009 Jul 9;32(4):366–375. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.06.002

Table 3.

Performance of reach and grasp of IDA infants compared to non-anemic infants in light of normal development of reach and grasp around 9–10 months

Optotrak kinematic variable IDA compared to IS Normal developmental
change around 9–10 mo
Peak aperture No difference
Huge effect size and a
trend towards:
↑ IDA>IS
Reach duration No difference
Very large effect size:
↓ IDA<IS
Duration from peak aperture to first contact No difference
Very large effect size:
↓ IDA<IS
Peak velocity ↑ IDA>IS ↓ (3); General
developmental ↑ with
possible ↓ specifically at 9
mo (2)
Number of MU No difference
Very large effect size:
↑ IDA>IS
↓ (3); no change (2)
Straightness ratio of hand trajectory ↑ IDA<IS ↓ (4); no change (1)
Path length No difference
Medium effect size:
↑ IDA>IS
No change
Duration from reach onset to peak velocity No difference
Very large effect size:
↓ IDA<IS
No change
Duration from reach onset to peak aperture ↓ IDA>IS No normative data

Note. The direction of statistically significant differences is shown for each kinematic variable. Arrows show the direction of the difference to facilitate comparisons to expected changes during normal development. In the last column arrows show the direction of normal developmental changes expected around 9–10 months compared to earlier ages. When there is conflicting evidence in the normative longitudinal studies, the number of papers supporting each result is given in parenthesis.