Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep 2;201(5):534.e1–534.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.024

Table 2.

Outcomes following concurrent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence between age groups

Variable Younger than 65 years (N=122) 65 years or older (N=70) P-value
Change in PFDI-20* component (mean, SD)
 Overall score −83.0 (63) −63.2 (31) .04
 Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory −27.5 (25.2) −21.3 (26.8) .13
 Urinary Distress Inventory −41.4 (29.9) −28.5 (31) .007
 Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory −13.8 (22.1) −12.2 (20.5) .6

Change in PFIQ-7 component (mean, SD)
 Overall score −49.8 (60.1) −30.0 (40.2) .10
 Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire −13.8 (26.4) −6.9 (21.3) .08
 Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire −24.9 (31.9) −14 (27.5) .04
 Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire −11.4 (23.7) −2.9 (11.6) .01

Postoperative POPQ stage (median, range) 1 (0–2) 1 (0–2) .88
*

Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20

Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7