Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Nov;33(11):1673–1682. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181b6bde3

Table 3.

Comparison between tenascin-X and established diagnostic markers in differentiating malignant mesothelioma (MM) from ovarian/peritoneal carcinoma (OC/PPC) and breast carcinoma in effusions (n=130) a

Antibody (target tumor) Number of staining cases (%) b Sensitivity c Specificity c
OC/PPC Breast Mesothelioma
Ber-EP4 (carcinoma) 47/47 (100%) 45/47 (96%) 13/36 (36%) 98% 64%
B72.3 (carcinoma) 42/47 (89%) 23/47 (49%) 0/36 (0%) 69% 100%
EMA - membrane (MM) 0/47 (0%) 0/47 (0%) 33/36 (92%) 92% 100%
EMA - cytoplasm + membrane (carcinoma) 47/47 (100%) 47/47 (100%) 2/36 (6%) 100% 94%
Calretinin (MM) 9/47 (19%) 11/47 (23%) 35/36 (97%) 97% 79%

Tenascin-X (MM) 5/47 (11%) 15/47 (32%) 33/36 (92%) 92% 79%
a

Immunohistochemistry performed on a different specimen in 6 of 136 cases, which are therefore not shown in this table.

b

Any number of cells

c

For the differentiation between carcinoma and mesothelioma