Table 2.
South Rift |
Pisces Peak |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
15 f.u. cut-off | 50 f.u. cut-off | 15 f.u. cut-off | 50 f.u. cut-off | |
TRFLP peaks perfect match | 12 ± 4 | 8 ± 10 | 42 ± 4 | 56 ± 11 |
TRFLP peaks off by 1–2 bp | 25 ± 13 | 37 ± 29 | 30 ± 4 | 32 ± 12 |
TRFLP peaks not matched | 63 ± 12 | 55 ± 20 | 28 ± 3 | 12 ± 7 |
TRFLP ‘members’ identified | 67 ± 11 | 75 ± 9 | 92 ± 3 | 93 ± 3 |
in silico peaks perfect match | 24 ± 13 | 6 ± 8 | 29 ± 4 | 15 ± 4 |
in silico peaks off by 1–2 bp | 45 ± 15 | 20 ± 15 | 21 ± 4 | 8 ± 3 |
in silico peaks not matched | 30 ± 7 | 77 ± 3 | 50 ± 6 | 77 ± 3 |
Data are presented for the correlations when the measured TRFLP fragments are assumed versus both 15- and 50-fluorescence-unit (f.u.) threshold cut-off values.