Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 13;11(12):1431–1438. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp157

Table 2.

PREP use by demographic characteristics and demographic profile of PREP versus non-PREP users (among all 43,419 current and former smokers)

Variablesa % PREP use PREP vs. non-PREP users
p Value
Total N = 1,005 (2.5%) PREP users, N = 1,005 (%) Non-PREP users, N = 42,414 (%)
Gender
    Male 2.51 481 (53.4) 20,385 (53.4) 1.0000
    Female 2.51 524 (46.6) 22,029 (46.6)
Age
    < 25 3.65 202 (25.4) 5,624 (17.3) .0000
    26–44 2.44 425 (40.7) 17,954 (42.0)
    45–64 2.24 321 (29.3) 14,890 (33.0)
    65+ 1.51 57 (4.6) 3,946 (7.8)
Race/ethnicity
    Non-Hispanic White 2.67 830 (82.5) 34,117 (77.4) .0332
    Non-Hispanic Black 1.81 67 (7.5) 3,296 (10.4)
    Hispanic/Latino 1.95 55 (6.9) 2,717 (9.0)
    Asian/Pacific Islander 1.97 14 (1.9) 757 (2.4)
    American Indian 3.50 16 (1.2) 658 (0.8)
Education
    <12 years 2.35 145 (14.7) 6,302 (15.7) .0151
    GED 2.70 19 (1.9) 650 (1.8)
    High school graduate 2.19 353 (33.0) 16,574 (38.1)
    Some college + 2.84 488 (50.4) 18,888 (44.5)
Occupation
    White-collar 2.76 404 (53.6) 16,085 (50.9) .0020
    Blue-collar 2.88 156 (19.4) 5,640 (17.6)
    Service 2.29 195 (26.7) 9,011 (30.6)
    Other 0.80 4 (0.3) 267 (0.9)
Geographic location
    Midwest 2.48 293 (25.2) 11,762 (25.6) .000
    South 3.22 369 (47.2) 12,459 (36.6)
    West 1.96 174 (15.1) 9,678 (19.4)
    Northeast 1.73 169 (12.5) 8,515 (18.4)

Note. GED = General Equivalency Diploma; PREP = potential reduced-exposure tobacco product.

a

Other variables considered in the bivariate analyses included income, employment status, school enrollment, and living in a metropolitan location; however, there were no statistically significant findings at the .05 level for these variables.