Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 30;14(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1150-0

Table 1.

STARD checklist for the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy

Section and topic Item no. On page no.
Title/Abstract/Key words 1 Identify the article as a study of diagnostic accuracy (recommend MeSH heading “sensitivity and specificity”)
Introduction 2 State the research questions or study aims, such as estimating diagnostic accuracy or comparing accuracy between tests or across participant groups
Methods Describe
Participants 3 The study population: the inclusion and exclusion criteria, setting and locations where the data were collected
4 Participant recruitment: was recruitment based on presenting symptoms, results from previous tests, or the fact that the participants had received the index tests or the reference standard?
5 Participant sampling: was the study population a consecutive series of participants defined by the selection criteria in items 3 and 4? If not, specify how participants were further selected
6 Data collection: was data collection planned before the index test and reference standard were performed (prospective study) or after (retrospective study)?
Test methods 7 The reference standard and its rationale
8 Technical specifications of material and methods involved, including how and when measurements were taken, and/or cite references for index tests and reference standard
9 Definition of and rationale for the units, cutoffs, and/or categories of the results of the index tests and the reference standard
10 The number, training, and expertise of the persons executing and reading the index tests and the reference standard
11 Whether or not the readers of the index tests and reference standard were blind (masked) to the results of the other test, and describe any other clinical information available to the readers
Statistical methods 12 Methods for calculating or comparing measures of diagnostic accuracy, and the statistical methods used to quantify uncertainty (e.g., 95% confidence intervals)
13 Methods for calculating test reproducibility, if done
Results Report
Participants 14 When study was done, including beginning and ending dates of recruitment
15 Clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population (e.g., age, sex spectrum of presenting symptoms, comorbidity, current treatments, recruitment centers)
16 The number of participants satisfying the criteria for inclusion that did or did not undergo the index tests and/or the reference standard; describe why participants failed to receive either test (a flow diagram is strongly recommended)
Test results 17 Time interval from the index tests to the reference standard, and any treatment administered between
18 Distribution of severity of disease (define criteria) in those with the target condition; other diagnoses in participants without the target condition
19 A cross-tabulation of the results of the index tests (including indeterminate and missing results) by the results of the reference standard; for continuous results, the distribution of the test results by the results of the reference standard
20 Any adverse events from performing the index tests or the reference standard
Estimates 21 Estimates of diagnostic accuracy and measures of statistical uncertainty (e.g., 95% confidence intervals)
22 How indeterminate results, missing responses, and outliers of the index tests were handled
23 Estimates of variability of diagnostic accuracy between subgroups of participants, readers, or centers, if done
24 Estimates of test reproducibility, if done
Discussion 25 Discuss the clinical applicability of the study findings

Adapted from reference 12

MeSH, medical subject heading; STARD, standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy