Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 1;25(8):847–854. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9485-7

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of CTCA in all patients

Prevalence of disease (%) N TP TN FP FN Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) LR+ LR− Diagnostic accuracy (%)
All patients 68 360 244 73 41 2 99 (97–100) 64 (55–73) 86 (81–89) 97 (90–100) 2.8 (2.2–3.5) 0.13 (0.00–0.05) 88 (85–91)
A: CS <10 24 62 15 42 5 0 100 (75–100) 89 (76–96) 75 (51–90) 100 (90–100) 9.4 (4.1–22) 0.00 (0.00–n/an) 92 (85–99)
B: CS 10 to <100 65 63 41 13 9 0 100 (89–100) 59 (37–79) 82 (68–91) 100 (72–100 2.4 (1.5–4.0) 0.00 (0.00–n/an) 86 (77–94)
C: CS 100 to <400 75 118 86 15 15 2 98 (91–100) 50 (32–68) 85 (76–91) 88 (62–98) 2.0 (1.4–2.8) 0.12 (0.02–0.38) 86 (79–92)
D: CS ≥400 87 114 99 3 12 0 100 (95–100) 20 (5–49) 89 (82–94) 100 (31–100) 1.3 (1.0–1.6) 0.00 (0.00–n/an) 89 (84–95)
A vs. D NS p = 0.017 NS NS p < 0.0001 n/an NS

Diagnostic performance of CTCA in all patients combined, and in subgroups per Agatston CS (A: CS less than 10, B: CS between 10 and 100, C: CS between 100 and 400, and D: CS greater than 400). Specificity and positive likelihood ratio decreased with increasing CS (p-value for the comparison by Chi-squared test across groups A and D)

Abbreviations: N, number of patients; TP, true positive; at least one significant stenosis in a patient detected by CTCA and CCA regardless of location of stenosis; TN, true negative; no significant stenosis in a patient detected either by CTCA or CCA; FP, false positive; significant stenosis detected by CTCA and no significant stenosis detected by CCA; FN, false negative, no significant stenosis detected by CTCA and at least one significant stenosis detected by CCA; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR−, negative likelihood ratio; n/an, not analyzed (division by zero)