Table 2.
Comparisons of results for PTGBA and PTGBD
Authors | Number of patients | Technical success | Clinical responses | Complications |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ito (2004)12 | PTGBA, 28 | 82% | 61% | 0.4% |
PTGBD, 30 | 100% | 90%* | 0.3% | |
Kutsumi (2004)10 | PTGBA, 94 | 100% | 83% (91%a) | 1.1% |
PTGBD, 13 | 100% | – | 23.1% | |
Chopra (2001)3 | PTGBA, 31 | 97% | 74% | 0 |
PTGBD, 22 | 97% | 86% | 12%* | |
Mizumoto (1992)11 | PTGBA, 58 | 98% | 81% (94%a) | 2.5% |
– |
* P < 0.05
a PTGBA was performed twice or more