Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 30;14(1):46–51. doi: 10.1007/s00534-006-1155-8

Table 2.

Comparisons of results for PTGBA and PTGBD

Authors Number of patients Technical success Clinical responses Complications
Ito (2004)12 PTGBA, 28 82% 61% 0.4%
PTGBD, 30 100% 90%* 0.3%
Kutsumi (2004)10 PTGBA, 94 100% 83% (91%a) 1.1%
PTGBD, 13 100% 23.1%
Chopra (2001)3 PTGBA, 31 97% 74% 0
PTGBD, 22 97% 86% 12%*
Mizumoto (1992)11 PTGBA, 58 98% 81% (94%a) 2.5%

* P < 0.05

a PTGBA was performed twice or more