Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Mar 3;103(Suppl 1):S33–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.01.003

Table 3. Results for Fixed Effects for HGLM Models (Random Intercept Only) for Provision of Intensive Treatment.

Variable Coefficient SE T-ratio df Odds Ratio
State Structural Characteristics (N = 41)
Median Household Income <-0.01 <0.01 -0.32 32 1.00
Percent Urban 0.01 0.02 0.79 32 1.01
Drug Arrest Rate <0.01 <0.01 0.16 32 1.00
Average Annual Change in Incarceration Rates 1995-2004 0.08 0.06 1.30 32 1.09
Percent Substance Dependence/Abuse 0.34 0.16 2.16** 32 1.40
Republican Governor in 2005 -0.53 0.23 -2.25** 32 0.59
SA TX Expenditures per capita <0.01 <0.01 1.92 32 1.00
Percent SA Expenditures from Medicaid -0.02 0.01 -1.24 32 0.98

Executive Administrators (N = 97)
Organizational Culture 0.15 0.29 0.53 84 1.17
Training & Resources
 Training -0.23 0.18 -1.26 84 0.79
 Funding 0.28 0.12 2.37** 84 1.32
 Physical Facilities 0.06 0.18 0.36 84 1.07
 Staffing & Retention 0.01 0.22 0.04 84 1.01
 Community Support -0.11 0.25 -0.45 84 0.89
Systems Integration
 Shared Activities with Other Correctional Agencies 0.03 0.04 0.81 84 1.03
 Contact w/Intra-Agency Directors on SA Issues 0.02 0.02 0.95 84 1.02
 Direct Contact Between Executive and SA TX Staff 0.42 0.09 4.72*** 84 1.52
 Direct Contact Between Executive and Correctional Staff -0.43 0.22 -1.93* 84 0.65

 Centralized Agency 0.30 0.32 0.95 84 1.36
 Decentralized 0.27 0.37 0.73 84 1.31
 Partially Centralized (Suppressed) -- -- -- -- --

Facility Characteristics (N = 426)
Adult Corrections 0.20 0.29 0.69 400 1.22
Prison/Juvenile Residential Institution 0.73 0.35 2.10** 400 2.08
Jail/Detention Facility 0.21 0.27 0.76 400 1.23
Community Corrections Facility/Office -- -- -- -- --
Size of Facility <0.01 <0.01 0.81 400 1.00

Note. SE = Standard Error, SA TX = Substance Abuse Treatment

*

p < .10

**

p < .05

***

p < .01

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure